{"id":10539,"date":"2013-11-06T06:00:11","date_gmt":"2013-11-05T19:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=10539"},"modified":"2013-11-07T08:43:26","modified_gmt":"2013-11-06T21:43:26","slug":"electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/","title":{"rendered":"Electronic surveillance of all by all"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n

The arcane world of electronic surveillance is suddenly prominent. Based on Edward Snowden\u2019s comments, the media holds that America dramatically expanded electronic surveillance after the 9\/11 terrorist attacks to include Angela Merkel<\/a>, 35 other foreign leaders<\/a> and the populations of France, Brazil, Spain and many others<\/a>.<\/p>\n

So what? The supporters of such types of surveillance claim that\u00a0everybody is doing it<\/a>. That\u2019s not the soundest of arguments however, and it\u2019s worth understanding why \u2018everyone\u2019 is so enamoured with the idea.<\/p>\n

Machiavelli advised that any action was valued that advanced the state. The national interest should drive a state\u2019s actions but these actions should be judged against the results achieved. Actions that weaken the state, that are reckless and that are indifferent to the range of possible consequences are deemed imprudent. The results achieved justify the actions taken; this is \u2018the morality of results\u2019. So for those that are international relations realists the question of electronic surveillance shouldn\u2019t be related to some higher moral frame\u2014or some obsession<\/a>\u2014but in terms of advancing the national interest. Success generates its own morality.<\/p>\n

America\u2019s National Security Agency has advanced some strong arguments by noting its successes in the war against Al-Qaeda. For example, in addressing Spanish critics, the NSA noted<\/a> that it helped assist in the release of kidnapped aid workers. There appear similarly strong arguments for the electronic surveillance of bad states\u2014think Bletchley Park and the Nazis<\/a>. The case for electronic surveillance focussed on direct armed and dangerous threats to national security is compelling.<\/p>\n

But an NSA history<\/a>\u00a0observes that when electronic surveillance really mattered during the Vietnam War \u2018critical information was mishandled, misinterpreted, lost, or ignored. Hoovering up information is one thing, but making effective use of it another. And there\u2019s a further worry. The ships in the Gulf of Tonkin NSA failure weren\u2019t just having an offshore cruise; rather they were part of a close-in electronic surveillance program<\/a>\u00a0that attracted North Vietnamese attention. Signals intelligence collection in this case unintentionally led to large-scale American intervention in Vietnam. Perhaps, overall, this didn\u2019t advance American national interest.<\/p>\n

This is all a quite narrow view on spying: keep a watch on direct national security threats, properly analyse what has been obtained and avoiding starting wars when collecting information. But there\u2019s a more expansive position, which embraces such approaches as spying on allied leaders, even close allies with gold-standard alliances.<\/p>\n

The motivation here isn\u2019t a threat that the spyee country represents to national security but rather the aim of better understand the ‘leadership intentions’<\/a>\u00a0of allies. This position wasn\u2019t publically articulated before Snowden and the furor since shows why.\u00a0Friends trust friends<\/a>. If they have a question they ask, not tap their phone for a decade or more. It\u2019s particularly ironic for Merkel<\/a>: spied on by the Stasi<\/a>, now spied on by America.<\/p>\n

This \u2018naive\u2019 viewpoint<\/a>\u00a0is a liberal one that places value on cooperation for absolute gains where all involved are better off. To realists this is hogwash. If the Germans don\u2019t like being spied on, this viewpoint means they are entitled to spy on the US\u2014indeed encouraged to<\/a>. Not quite true. Israel, an American friend, has history here<\/a>;\u00a0their spy remains incarcerated<\/a> and while Israel no longer undertakes<\/a> such practices, some think<\/a> Israel is now itself a target.\u00a0Those who think no one should make a fuss if spied on are rarely as sanguine when they\u2019re the target.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a difference between realist alliances with authoritarian states with which there\u2019s a common threat (such as the west and the Soviets during WWII) and alliances of liberal democracies working together with shared values for the common good. In the latter, where a security community<\/a>\u00a0exists, surely other methods of communicating information could be employed before conducting electronic surveillance. If not, then it might be worth asking much bigger questions on the relationship.<\/p>\n

Beyond the narrow lens of national security, the more expansive view has a further dimension. National security relies on economic security so why shouldn\u2019t national electronic surveillance means be used to gain insider information<\/a>? In the globalised neoliberal world this is all a bit problematic. Trade agreements are made because both sides find them mutually beneficial, not to simply exploit others. An argument is that such electronic surveillance<\/a>\u00a0means you know the other side\u2019s bottom line. The alternative may be to ask your trade partner\u2019s political leaders what\u2019s unacceptable to them. I suspect there\u2019s little doubt on this in most negotiations!<\/p>\n

Electronic surveillance of big businesses sounds promising<\/a>\u00a0but, given many are multi-national, damaging them may be an own goal<\/a>. Your citizens and their super funds might own the multi-national company directly or indirectly. Your country may be seeking their investment. Assuming useful secrets are gained, who should get this information? If a local firm, the issues of who owns it and who gets the profits in a globalised world remain. And it\u2019s is giving some especially favored firm a leg up. There are echoes of some new form of crony capitalism here. Giving favorites privileged access to the state apparatus for their own personal financial benefit is untidy. In neoliberal thinking this does not make more efficient markets and better societies but rather works against it. Is all this in the national interest?<\/p>\n

This returns us to the more narrow view of electronic surveillance being preferred for security against threats\u2014even if the temptations of using electronic surveillance for other purposes are almost overwhelming. But the narrow view isn\u2019t actually that narrow. In the days of transnational extremists, there\u2019s no domestic and international; it\u2019s all one. Cross border electronic surveillance of others\u2019 civil societies might well yield good security outcomes, but is highly contentious and needs much thought\u2014and maybe closer cooperation<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Peter Layton is undertaking a research PhD in grand strategy at UNSW, and has been an associate professor of national security strategy at the US National Defense University. Image courtesy of Wikipedia<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The arcane world of electronic surveillance is suddenly prominent. Based on Edward Snowden\u2019s comments, the media holds that America dramatically expanded electronic surveillance after the 9\/11 terrorist attacks to include Angela Merkel, 35 other foreign …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":10544,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,170,500],"class_list":["post-10539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia","tag-intelligence","tag-surveillance"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nElectronic surveillance of all by all | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Electronic surveillance of all by all | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The arcane world of electronic surveillance is suddenly prominent. Based on Edward Snowden\u2019s comments, the media holds that America dramatically expanded electronic surveillance after the 9\/11 terrorist attacks to include Angela Merkel, 35 other foreign ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-11-05T19:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-11-06T21:43:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/Bansky_one_nation_under_cctv.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"535\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Layton\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Layton\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/Bansky_one_nation_under_cctv.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/Bansky_one_nation_under_cctv.jpeg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":535},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/\",\"name\":\"Electronic surveillance of all by all | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-11-05T19:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-11-06T21:43:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/29360a408b5260662f7ef47ed8b412bc\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Electronic surveillance of all by all\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/29360a408b5260662f7ef47ed8b412bc\",\"name\":\"Peter Layton\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3335f8637f873522c3c11d3b852df6cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3335f8637f873522c3c11d3b852df6cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter Layton\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-layton\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Electronic surveillance of all by all | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Electronic surveillance of all by all | The Strategist","og_description":"The arcane world of electronic surveillance is suddenly prominent. Based on Edward Snowden\u2019s comments, the media holds that America dramatically expanded electronic surveillance after the 9\/11 terrorist attacks to include Angela Merkel, 35 other foreign ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2013-11-05T19:00:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-11-06T21:43:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":535,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/Bansky_one_nation_under_cctv.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Peter Layton","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Layton","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/Bansky_one_nation_under_cctv.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/Bansky_one_nation_under_cctv.jpeg","width":800,"height":535},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/","name":"Electronic surveillance of all by all | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2013-11-05T19:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2013-11-06T21:43:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/29360a408b5260662f7ef47ed8b412bc"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/electronic-surveillance-of-all-by-all\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Electronic surveillance of all by all"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/29360a408b5260662f7ef47ed8b412bc","name":"Peter Layton","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3335f8637f873522c3c11d3b852df6cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3335f8637f873522c3c11d3b852df6cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter Layton"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-layton\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10539"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10539"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10539\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10581,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10539\/revisions\/10581"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10544"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}