{"id":11704,"date":"2014-01-14T12:15:00","date_gmt":"2014-01-14T01:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=11704"},"modified":"2014-01-15T08:08:47","modified_gmt":"2014-01-14T21:08:47","slug":"reserving-judgement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/reserving-judgement\/","title":{"rendered":"Reserving judgement"},"content":{"rendered":"
With another Defence white paper in the offing<\/a>, opinions abound on what that document should prescribe for the ADF\u2019s force structure. As always, the challenge is setting a structure that meets Australia\u2019s defence needs without exceeding its budget.<\/p>\n Even if it\u2019s never used, force structure has two pricey elements: personnel and their equipment. Nowadays, personnel tends to be the more expensive component in Western militaries (about 42% in Australia). With this in mind, and as Nic Stuart<\/a> forecast for the last white paper, one of the options that the new document should again consider is the ADF\u2019s mix of Regular and Reserve units. The traditional premise for this consideration is that Reserve forces are cheaper than Regular ones when they\u2019re not being used.<\/p>\n In most militaries, regular\u2013reserve mix is a fraught issue, influenced by \u2018empirical\u2019 questions of cost, quality and readiness, to say nothing of vexed aspects like professional credentialism, local interests and politics. Accurately gauging even the empirical pieces is complicated by rubbery metrics. But the last 12 years provide a powerful case study of the employment of Reserve forces in major conflicts that could be useful to the white paper deliberations.<\/p>\n Take the case of the largest Coalition player in both Afghanistan and Iraq: the United States. The graph below shows the number of US National Guard and Reserve personnel (the two categories of US military \u2018part timers\u2019\u2014with apologies to Guardsmen, I\u2019ll call them all Reservists henceforth) that have been \u2018activated\u2019 to fight those conflicts since 9\/11. Scratching below the surface reveals some interesting insights.<\/p>\n