{"id":12211,"date":"2014-02-12T06:00:37","date_gmt":"2014-02-11T19:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=12211"},"modified":"2014-02-13T13:07:09","modified_gmt":"2014-02-13T02:07:09","slug":"defence-efficiency-aspis-view","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-efficiency-aspis-view\/","title":{"rendered":"Defence efficiency: ASPI’s view"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n

On the 22nd of October last year, the Abbott government announced a National Commission of Audit<\/a> to \u2018to review and report on the performance, functions and roles of the Commonwealth government’. Headed by the chairman of the Business Council of Australia, Tony Shepherd, the Commission has a remit<\/a> (PDF) to examine the scope, efficiency and effectiveness of government spending. A key task for the Commission is to recommend \u2018savings sufficient to deliver a surplus of 1 per cent of GDP prior to 2023-24\u2019.<\/p>\n

With Defence accounting for 6.5% of government outlays, it will have to attract the attention of the Commission. There\u2019s certainly a precedent; the Howard government\u2019s 1996 Commission of Audit<\/a> recommended a 10% efficiency improvement target for government agencies and specifically said that Defence should be included. It wasn’t. Instead, the government imposed an \u2018administrative savings program\u2019 amounting to only 1.3% of the budget. This time around, the situation is made more interesting by the Government\u2019s promise to boost defence spending to 2% of GDP within 10 years<\/a>.<\/p>\n

ASPI\u2019s submission to the Commission regarding Defence can be found here<\/a>. Key messages include:<\/p>\n