{"id":12892,"date":"2014-03-19T12:15:39","date_gmt":"2014-03-19T01:15:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=12892"},"modified":"2014-03-20T11:30:05","modified_gmt":"2014-03-20T00:30:05","slug":"qdr-2014-more-reassurance-than-worry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/qdr-2014-more-reassurance-than-worry\/","title":{"rendered":"QDR 2014: more reassurance than worry"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Peter Jennings\u2019 recent post on the 2014 QDR<\/a> led me to read the report\u2014and its\u00a050% longer, more ambitious and less focussed 2010 predecessor.<\/p>\n I’ll adopt Peter\u2019s format of worries and hopes\/opportunities for Asia-Pacific allies and partners (the majority of states in this region). The 2014 document and the comparison with its predecessor left me with three worries, three reassurances\/opportunities and a net assessment that the reassurances significantly outweigh the worries.<\/p>\n Worries<\/b><\/p>\n Reassurances\/opportunities<\/b><\/p>\n Overall, the 2014 QDR underlines the defence side of the Obama administration\u2019s \u2018rebalance to Asia\u2019. Now, if the Trans-Pacific Partnership can be completed soon and Congress can provide the President with Trade Promotion Authority<\/a>, the trade and commercial side of the \u2018rebalance\u2019 can catch up.<\/p>\n\n
\n