{"id":13485,"date":"2014-04-22T06:00:35","date_gmt":"2014-04-21T20:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=13485"},"modified":"2014-04-23T09:19:31","modified_gmt":"2014-04-22T23:19:31","slug":"the-canberra-officer-4-taming-the-service-chiefs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-canberra-officer-4-taming-the-service-chiefs\/","title":{"rendered":"The Canberra officer (4): taming the service chiefs"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n When the chiefs of the Army, Navy and Air Force make a combined visit to the Prime Minister, it can mean coup, revolution or war. So when the three service chiefs met John Howard, in Sydney on Friday 4 April 1997, elements of all three were in the air. The conflict was all inside the Defence Force. The Chief of the Defence Force had staged a coup over the previous two decades as he\u2019d been slowly absorbing the powers of the service chiefs. Within a week, the government was scheduled to release the Defence Efficiency Review, tipped as the most important reorganisation of Defence in nearly a quarter of a century. As a result the war over lines of command and power flared into open revolt.<\/p>\n The review marked another phase in the evolution of jointery<\/a>, the taming of the service tribes\u00a0and elevation of the Defence Force chief so his power matched his title.\u00a0As the military shifted from the Old to the New Testament<\/a>\u00a0it created new names and identities\u2014crucially, the Australian Defence Force and CDF (wonderful examples of the invention of tradition).<\/p>\n In this evolution, the Chief of Defence Force Staff in 1976 replaced the Chairman, Chiefs of Staff Committee. From chairman to chief was a shift that mattered. Under the changes, the service chiefs were responsible to the Defence Minister, through the CDFS, for command of their services, but service chiefs still had the right of direct access to the Minister.<\/p>\n In 1984, the CDFS became Chief of the Defence Force (CDF)\u2014a recommendation of the Utz report that the top military job had to have clear authority to match its responsibilities. The first CDF, Sir Phillip Bennett<\/a>\u00a0(pictured), built substance into the new name and continued the fight to get staff to go with it. Mobilising the symbols, he had the sign \u2018Headquarters Australian Defence Force\u2019 placed outside his Russell office and the number plate \u2018ADF 1\u2019 placed on his official car.<\/p>\n