{"id":13677,"date":"2014-05-05T14:30:21","date_gmt":"2014-05-05T04:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=13677"},"modified":"2014-05-07T06:11:06","modified_gmt":"2014-05-06T20:11:06","slug":"australia-in-the-age-of-an-introspective-united-states","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-in-the-age-of-an-introspective-united-states\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia in the age of an introspective United States?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>President Obama\u2019s recent Asian tour, although successful, has done little to dilute the questioning of his global leadership style. A\u00a0<\/a>New York Times<\/i> editorial<\/a> on the weekend concluded that the president\u2019s foreign policy isn\u2019t as bad as his critics claim, but \u2018just not good enough\u2019. And Obama\u2019s recent defence of his foreign policy<\/a> leaves no doubt that a rebalancing of US global engagement is underway. Obama criticises those who would involve the American people in a further set of wars they don\u2019t want\u2014a clear sign that domestic priorities are currently at the centre of US strategic and defence policy.<\/p>\n Obama\u2019s political instincts are probably correct. Recent opinion polling<\/a> in the US confirms a swing towards a more inward-looking US, even though those wanting a US less involved in global affairs don\u2019t actually constitute a majority. In part, of course, the swing\u2019s a natural reaction to the costs of a post-9\/11 role, which has seen the US involved in its longest war in history for mixed returns. And the swings-and-roundabouts theory suggests that future US foreign policy will wax as well as wane.<\/p>\n But astute observers of the US system\u2014like Steven Metz and Paul Pillar\u2014are both suggesting a more contracted US strategic role, at least for some period of time. Metz has written recently<\/a> of a future where the US returns to its traditional foreign policy preference: one reflecting a stand-offish approach to international problems. As he observes, America\u2019s geographic isolation means that, in one sense, all its wars are wars of choice. And Pillar has suggested<\/a> that the US shouldn\u2019t fret as much as it does about its worried allies\u2014for the simple reason that not all allies\u2019 worries reflect actual US strategic priorities.<\/p>\n Among Obama\u2019s critics in the US, and especially within the Republican party, the tendency is to blame the president for the current difficulties in US foreign policy. If only that were true\u2014the problems might then be worrying but self-limiting. The Obama presidency still has another 30 months to run, but after that both Americans and the world could expect to see a new president shrug off their predecessor\u2019s legacy and play a more vigorous role in global arrangements.<\/p>\n