<\/a>In two weeks\u2019 time, ASPI\u2019s annual Cost of Defence<\/i> will hit the streets, detailing the ins and outs of the 2014 Defence budget. For those who can\u2019t wait, here\u2019s a preliminary analysis of the key points.<\/p>\n In the current fiscal environment, it was a surprisingly good budget for Defence. Spending will rise to $29.3 billion next financial year, a nominal increase of $2.3 billion on what was spent this year and a real (corrected for inflation) increase of 6.1%. As a share of GDP, defence spending will rise from 1.7% this financial year to 1.8% next year.<\/p>\n
The key initiatives in this year\u2019s defence budget was the reprogramming of $2 billion from 2017\u201318 which resulted in an additional $500 million this year (2013\u201314) and an additional $300 million, $550 million and $150 million respectively across the next three years. Yes, that\u2019s right; despite the government\u2019s fiscal consolidation, Defence will get extra money four years in a row.<\/p>\n
On the savings front, there\u2019s $1.2 billion to be saved over the next four years from \u2018back office\u2019 reforms, all of which will be available for reinvestment in capability\u2014ie Defence will retain the money generated. Consistent with this, the number of civilians employed will fall from 20,900 today to 18,600 in four years\u2019 time.<\/p>\n
Over the next three years, defence spending is slated to remain largely static in real terms before rising to $30.6 billion in 2017\u201318. Beyond that, we don\u2019t have visibility of what\u2019s planned. But for the government to make good on its promise to boost defence spending to 2% of GDP by 2023\u201324, they would need to increase defence spending by around 5.3% every year for the six years following the forward estimates period.<\/p>\n
On past experience, a sustained 5.3% rate of growth will be challenging to achieve. During the 2000s, when defence spending was growing at around 3% a year, Defence and defence industry had trouble absorbing the increase\u2014to the extent that substantial sums of money were handed back. However, this time, there are 3\u20134 years available to prepare for the ramp-up so we can perhaps be more optimistic. Moreover, there\u2019s nothing to stop the government from using future budgets to ease the task by commencing growth towards 2% of GDP prior to 2017\u201318. Indeed, one of the critical decisions for the forthcoming white paper will be the funding envelope from 2015 onwards.<\/p>\n
A potential complication is that the government plans to return the Commonwealth to surplus around 2018\u201319, just after it looks as though defence spending will take off. If the government\u2019s fiscal projections turn out to be overly optimistic, there\u2019ll be pressure for further savings in order to preserve the surplus. If this happens, defence spending can’t expect to be immune.<\/p>\n
Notwithstanding that risk, this year\u2019s defence budget is about as good as it gets in an environment dominated by fiscal concerns. Not only has Defence received more money in the near term, but a credible path to 2% of GDP has been established.<\/p>\n
Mark Thomson is senior analyst for defence economics<\/em>\u00a0at ASPI.<\/em>\u00a0Graph\u00a0(c) ASPI 2014.<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In two weeks\u2019 time, ASPI\u2019s annual Cost of Defence will hit the streets, detailing the ins and outs of the 2014 Defence budget. For those who can\u2019t wait, here\u2019s a preliminary analysis of the key …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":13838,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[120,23,26],"class_list":["post-13827","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-budget","tag-defence-economics","tag-defence-spending"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
The 2014 Defence budget\u2014as good as it gets! | The Strategist<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n