{"id":14172,"date":"2014-06-02T12:34:42","date_gmt":"2014-06-02T02:34:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=14172"},"modified":"2014-06-10T20:47:12","modified_gmt":"2014-06-10T10:47:12","slug":"asia-security-summit-trust-lost-order-wobbly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/asia-security-summit-trust-lost-order-wobbly\/","title":{"rendered":"Asia Security Summit: trust lost, order wobbly"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>The theme of last year\u2019s Shangri-La dialogue was the need to build trust and confidence. As Vietnam\u2019s Prime Minister, Nguyen\u00a0Tan Dung, said then: \u2018If trust is lost, all is lost<\/a>\u2019. Well, trust is lost. This year\u2019s Shangri-La is desperate for some law and a smattering of order. This year\u2019s speech from Vietnam gives the flavour. The Defence Minister General Phung Quang Thanh, spoke<\/a> in the session on \u2018Managing Strategic Tensions\u2019. His opening line praised the keynote address from Japan\u2019s Prime Minister and Japan\u2019s \u2018positive pacifism\u2019. Score that Japan 1, China 0.<\/p>\n Thanh referred back to his Prime Minister\u2019s trust line and lamented that \u2018trust building is evermore imperative\u2019. Then he turned to China, saying relations \u2018have seen overall strong growth\u2019 with \u2018frictions from time to time\u2019. \u00a0For friction, read high-seas confrontations with China\u2019s roving oil rig. The General said China\u2019s unilateral action in placing a deep water rig in Vietnam\u2019s EEZ had caused \u2018anger to the Vietnamese people and concerns to countries in the region\u2019.<\/p>\n While demanding that China withdraw the rig, Vietnam had used only coast guard and fishing vessels: \u2018I believe that the army of the two countries must exercise utmost restraint, strengthen cooperation and tightly control all activities, avoid activity that may get out of control\u2019.<\/p>\n In questions, General Thanh said Vietnam was trying to talk to Beijing at every level using phone calls, letters, special envoys and meetings. The aim would be to persevere with negotiations and to maintain friendship. In contrast with some other signals out of Hanoi, General Thanh said taking the dispute to international arbitration was an undesirable, last option. For the time being, Vietnam will continue to do this the Chinese way\u2014bilaterally. Whatever the score, those are China\u2019s rules.<\/p>\n The pleas for order so prominent in the Japanese and Australian speeches lead to the security guarantor; as \u00a0Australia\u2019s Defence Minister observed, the \u2018US has underpinned the region\u2019s stability for 70 years\u2019. For the last couple of years, the US pivot has been the central element of the American Shangria-La show\u2014 what\u2019s now the traditional first plenary devoted to the US Defence Secretary\u2019s address. This year, the rebalance got less wordage because, in the words of Chuck Hagel, \u2018The rebalance is not a goal, not a promise, or a vision\u2014 it\u2019s a reality.\u2019 That reality is being constructed by such things as \u2018comprehensive partnerships\u2019 with Vietnam and Malaysia and the new agreement on US forces in the Philippines, which Hagel called \u2018the most significant milestone for the US-Philippines alliance in more than a decade\u2019.<\/p>\n In a list the Defense Secretary gave four broad US security priorities in the Asia-Pacific. The hierarchy of US goals is an interesting comment on where the region is today:<\/p>\n Incidentally, while championing those norms it\u2019d be helpful if the US finally signed up to the UN Law of the Sea, as President Obama said yet again in his West Point speech. Not to do so is American exceptionalism writ large, and largely by US Senate peculiarity.<\/p>\n The fireworks in Hagel\u2019s speech were his description of China\u2019s \u2018destabilising, unilateral actions\u2019. The US, he said, would firmly oppose \u2018intimidation, coercion, or the threat of force\u2019 to assert territorial claims. The pushback came from the head of Beijing\u2019s delegation, the deputy chief of the PLA General Staff, Lieutenant General Wang Guanzhong, who announced he would depart from his prepared text to denounce the speeches by Hagel and Japan\u2019s Prime Minister<\/a> as coordinated, provocative and unacceptable actions against China.<\/p>\n I personally think that this speech by Mr Hagel is full of hegemony, full of words of threat and intimidation. It was a speech [not] to abate destabilizing factors, [but] to create troubles and make provocations. It was not a constructive speech. Given the two speeches made by Mr Abe and Mr Hagel and if we look at the actions they have taken, we have to ask: who is actually making provocations and create troubles, disputes and differences concerning territory, sovereignty, maritime rights and interests, China has never taken the first step to provoke troubles. China has only been forced to respond to the provocative actions by other parties. And on bilateral and multilateral occasions, and on the Shangri-La Dialogue, China has never been the first to provoke disputes and troubles. I think everyone understands who actually initiated disputes and troubles. Secondly, from the speeches made by Mr. Abe and Mr. Hagel, we have to ask: who is actually assertive? It is the United States and Japan who are assertive in concerted efforts, not China. And China is only making, forced to make the minimum, lowest level of response to their provocation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So, trust lost, order wobbly.<\/p>\n Graeme Dobell is the ASPI journalist fellow. He has been reporting from the 2014 Shangri-La Dialogue. Image courtesy of Flickr user Chuck Hagel<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The theme of last year\u2019s Shangri-La dialogue was the need to build trust and confidence. As Vietnam\u2019s Prime Minister, Nguyen\u00a0Tan Dung, said then: \u2018If trust is lost, all is lost\u2019. Well, trust is lost. This …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":14173,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[52,135,358,471,435,329,269,31,540],"class_list":["post-14172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-china","tag-japan","tag-shangri-la-dialogue","tag-south-china-sea","tag-sovereignty","tag-territorial-disputes","tag-unclos","tag-united-states","tag-vietnam"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n