{"id":14546,"date":"2014-06-30T06:00:57","date_gmt":"2014-06-29T20:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=14546"},"modified":"2014-07-03T08:56:59","modified_gmt":"2014-07-02T22:56:59","slug":"hillarys-pivot-posse-and-china-as-wild-west-desperado","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/hillarys-pivot-posse-and-china-as-wild-west-desperado\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary\u2019s pivot posse and China as Wild West desperado"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Hillary wants you to know what the US is doing in Asia is a \u2018pivot\u2019. The previous Secretary of State thinks \u2018rebalance\u2019 is bureaucratic blandness, and dismisses its usage as \u2018anodyne.\u2019<\/p>\n Part II of the Clinton memoir<\/a> is headed \u2018Across the Pacific\u2019 and the first chapter is \u2018Asia: The Pivot\u2019. And pivot it remains throughout. The purpose of the pivot is simple, even if the mechanisms are complex\u2014it\u2019s all about China.<\/p>\n Being present at the creation\u2014indeed, claiming creator\u2019s rights\u2014Clinton writes in plain terms about the purpose and the power of that grand strategy shift. Of her first trip as Secretary\u2014to Japan, Indonesia, South Korea and, finally, China\u2014Clinton says: \u2018We needed to send a message to Asia and the world that America was back.\u2019 She quotes the secretary-general of ASEAN on US \u2018diplomatic absenteeism\u2019 and comments: \u2018That was a rather pointed greeting but he was right about our intentions.\u2019<\/p>\n Citing husband Bill on the need to focus on trendlines and not just headlines, Hillary sees the pivot responding to what the US National Security Council called \u2018an historic transfer of relative wealth and economic power from West to East\u2019.<\/p>\n Clinton says US frictions with China are more than disagreements about individual issues\u2014the clash is over \u2018very different perceptions of how the world, or at least Asia, should work.\u2019 Her final thought is that in a contest over fundamentals, much could go wrong:<\/p>\n We have no interest in containing China. But we do insist that China play by the rules that bind all nations. In other words, the jury\u2019s still out. China has some hard choices to make, and so do we. We should follow a time-tested strategy. Work for the best outcome, but plan for something less. And stick to our values.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Hillary gives no space to Beijing\u2019s view that \u2018play by the rules\u2019 really means \u2018play by the US rules\u2019; yet there\u2019s plenty to buttress that interpretation. The economic pivot, the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiation, is \u2018a strategic initiative that would strengthen the position of the US in Asia\u2019.<\/p>\n Clinton expresses in one sentence the reason why Japan is in the TPP and China is not: \u2018The TPP became the signature economic pillar of our strategy in Asia, demonstrating the benefits of a rules-based order and greater cooperation with the US.\u2019 Ah, those rules again.<\/p>\n