{"id":14654,"date":"2014-07-08T06:00:24","date_gmt":"2014-07-07T20:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=14654"},"modified":"2014-07-09T09:46:05","modified_gmt":"2014-07-08T23:46:05","slug":"defence-projects-jobs-and-economic-growth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-projects-jobs-and-economic-growth\/","title":{"rendered":"Defence projects, jobs and economic growth"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n In a recent post<\/a>, Andrew Davies explained how the government ignored Defence\u2019s advice and chose the MRH90 over the Black Hawk helicopter\u2014presumably because the former offered more for local industry.<\/p>\n There\u2019s nothing intrinsically wrong with considering industry factors in defence procurement. As John Harvey reminded us<\/a>, a local preference can legitimately be based on defence self-reliance and\/or broader economic benefits. Consistent with this, government announcements routinely tout the economic benefits of defence projects. For example, this year\u2019s F-35 announcement<\/a> said:<\/p>\n The acquisition of F-35 aircraft will bring significant economic benefits to Australia, including in regional areas and for the local defence industry with more jobs and production for many locally-based skilled and technical manufacturers.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The message is clear; the more work that\u2019s done in Australia the better. In the case of the F-35, it\u2019s likely true. Rather than rely on offsets, Australian firms compete with foreign manufacturers to supply the global F-35<\/a> program so that only internationally competitive firms thrive. In other instances, local sourcing occurs absent foreign competition and at a sizable cost premium, such as the troubled Air Warfare Destroyer Project<\/a> where we are getting three vessels for the price of four<\/a>.<\/p>\n What\u2019s the lure of having work done locally? Apart from expectations of achieving greater self-reliance and more cost-effective through-life support (each a canard for another post), decision-makers probably believe that there\u2019s a net economic benefit from having work done in Australia even at a premium.<\/p>\n The notion that local production delivers an economic benefit has been cultivated by those eager to avoid foreign competition. DefenceSA<\/a>, the South Australia Government\u2019s defence lobbying arm, has produced two glossy publications (here<\/a> and here<\/a>) that extol the economic and industry benefits of local shipbuilding.<\/p>\n The DefenceSA reports quote an economic analysis of the Anzac Ship project<\/a> commissioned by the Australian Industry Group<\/a> in 2000. The scanned copy of report can be found here<\/a> (PDF) and its companion report on the Huon minehunter project<\/a> is here<\/a> (PDF). The reports employ two methodologies to estimate the economic impact of projects: input-output multiplier analysis and general equilibrium modeling.<\/p>\n Multiplier analysis estimates the gross economic impact of spending, and the table below summarises the key results from the Anzac and Huon reports:<\/p>\n Input-Output Multiplier analysis of recent major naval construction projects<\/b><\/p>\n