{"id":14853,"date":"2014-07-22T14:30:20","date_gmt":"2014-07-22T04:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=14853"},"modified":"2014-07-28T09:51:56","modified_gmt":"2014-07-27T23:51:56","slug":"australias-term-on-the-un-security-council-an-intensive-final-quarter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-term-on-the-un-security-council-an-intensive-final-quarter\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia\u2019s term on the UN Security Council: an intensive final quarter"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Less than a week ago, Australia spearheaded efforts for the adoption of a UN Security Council resolution<\/a> on the Syrian humanitarian crisis. This week Australian diplomats in New York, boosted by the high-profile engagement<\/a> of Foreign Minister Julie Bishop, have worked deftly to navigate their way around Russian opposition to reach agreement on resolution 2166<\/a> which calls for an independent and impartial investigation into the \u2018downing<\/a>\u2018 of flight MH17.<\/p>\n As a non-permanent Council member with a genuine strategic interest in the events unfolding in the Ukraine over the last few months, but little leverage to shape outcomes there, Australia\u2019s engagement on the situation during 19 Council meetings<\/a> since February had effectively been limited to that of a diligent and constructive board member.<\/p>\n But that changed when 37 Australian citizens and residents\u2014the most of any Council member\u2014lost their lives on MH17. Citizens from several countries, including the Netherlands, Malaysia and the UK, were among the 298 passengers and crew killed last week. Given the impact of the events on Australia\u2019s interests, it was natural for Australia to take a leadership role in pursuing a resolution for an independent and impartial investigation. But, without the support of other Council members, we would have had more difficulty doing so in such a short period of time\u2014something which reflects the level of respect<\/a> that Australia has garnered during its current term on the Council.<\/p>\n The Council agreed unanimously last week to resolution 2165<\/a> (PDF) on humanitarian access in Syria. This came after months of behind-the-scenes work by Australia, along with Luxembourg and Jordan, to finalise a text that would be acceptable to all Council members (including Russia and China, which have vetoed four previous resolutions on Syria). The resolution authorises the delivery of humanitarian aid by the UN system to the civilian population, without the requirement of consent<\/a> from the Syrian government. After more than three years of civil war, it\u2019s a small but significant step forward, which is expected to enable assistance to as many as 2 million civilians<\/a> on the ground.<\/p>\n Australia will rotate off the Council in less than six months. Recent events suggest the final quarter will be intense. Nonetheless, the last few months also present an opportunity to be the most effective: we\u2019ve now mastered the complex intricacies of Council procedures, established working relationships in New York, and built a stock of political capital with other members.<\/p>\n In the remaining months, it\u2019ll be important that Australia continues its substantive engagement in areas where it has built a reputation as an effective Council player. Most immediately, this will involve holding the Council\u2019s attention on the investigation into the events surrounding MH17 and ensuring that those responsible are held to account. Ongoing engagement with the UN will also be required on humanitarian access in Syria to ensure resolution 2165 is being implemented effectively. Supporting timely public briefings to the Council will maintain pressure on Russia in both those contexts.<\/p>\n We\u2019ll need similar efforts in areas where Australia holds clear Council responsibilities. As the \u2018pen-holder\u2019 (coordinator in the Council) on Afghanistan, it\u2019s expected that will include a Council product prior to the end of 2014 on the post-ISAF presence in Afghanistan. As chair of three UN sanctions committees, Australia has also invested time in shaping UN efforts on a more comprehensive approach<\/a> to sanctions. While that work could continue once Australia leaves the Council, there\u2019s more political capital available to influence those efforts in the next few months.<\/p>\n Australia\u2019s also in the unique and enviable position of holding a second Presidency of the Council in November, presenting another opportunity to pursue an outcome on a thematic issue. It\u2019s expected<\/a> that Australia will seek to focus on the role of policing in peacekeeping. Given the growing need for qualified and skilled police peacekeepers<\/a>, it\u2019s an issue that would benefit from further international engagement.<\/p>\n In addition to high profile activities, one of the most durable legacies that Australia can leave in the remaining few months will be incrementally shaping Council mandates, particularly on peacekeeping missions. While mandates are reviewed regularly, they essentially build on the language already agreed. Ensuring resolutions include language on Australian priorities\u2014such as protection of civilians and preventing the illicit flow of small arms and light weapons\u2014will help sustain our influence beyond our Council term.<\/p>\n While the Council\u2019s agenda might not always directly affect Australia, it does affect our interests\u2014and those of our partners and allies. As the government starts to contemplate the priorities and legacy from our current term on the Council, it should also be thinking about the lessons we\u2019ve learned\u2014and when Australia might step up to serve again.<\/p>\n