{"id":15373,"date":"2014-08-22T12:30:57","date_gmt":"2014-08-22T02:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=15373"},"modified":"2014-08-25T09:11:41","modified_gmt":"2014-08-24T23:11:41","slug":"on-the-future-of-air-power","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/on-the-future-of-air-power\/","title":{"rendered":"On the future of air power"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>As Herman G\u00f6ring might have said, \u2018when I hear the name Carl von Clausewitz, I reach for my gun\u2019. (He actually made the comment about the word \u2018culture\u2019.) Particularly when the reference occurs early on in a speech and when it\u2019s followed, in short order, with a machine-gun like spray of other military theorists\u2014finishing up with Azar Gat. There was, however, method in Air Marshal Geoff Brown\u2019s dinner speech<\/a> to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute and the reference to Gat (who believes traditional war is in decline in today\u2019s world) was certainly not accidental.<\/p>\n The Chief of Air Force began with a discursive explanation of how airpower had begun, during World War One, as little more than an ancillary to the real protagonists deciding the result on the ground. Then came the almost obligatory development of his theme, the transition from appendage to enabler in World War Two.<\/p>\n Perhaps I\u2019ve listened to too many after-dinner speeches. I\u2019d almost begun to drift off and count the rosettes on the ceiling. \u2018Now\u2019, I thought to myself, \u2018there\u2019ll be an elaboration of how the RAAF has subsequently become the decisive factor in the military equation\u2019. That was a mistake.<\/p>\n When Brown turned to the present he suddenly became specific. Gone were the broad brush-strokes with their theoretical references; replacing them came details and particulars. But, and much to my surprise, there weren\u2019t any references to the third generation of war\u2014one where airpower reigned supreme. Instead the Chief emphasised something we journalists find it difficult to get our heads around: there are no simplistic answers in modern conflict. It requires a team to achieve the objective, and every player has their part.<\/p>\n It\u2019s interesting to hear this sort of talk from one of the three service chiefs, particularly at a time of increasing financial stringencies. While it\u2019s true the announcement<\/a> we\u2019re going to buy the Joint Strike Fighter means the RAAF has already been given its Christmas and birthday presents for many years to come, technology is developing fast.<\/p>\n