{"id":15545,"date":"2014-09-02T12:30:59","date_gmt":"2014-09-02T02:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=15545"},"modified":"2014-09-03T10:45:18","modified_gmt":"2014-09-03T00:45:18","slug":"where-do-australian-interests-stop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/where-do-australian-interests-stop\/","title":{"rendered":"Where do Australian interests stop?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>As dawn broke on 1 January 1901, the splendidly-attired band of the Royal New South Wales Lancers was busy polishing its kit (including the new kettle-drums to be carried on a beautiful white Clydesdale draft-horse). The regiment would soon provide a ceremonial guard for Lord Hopetoun, our first Governor-General, as he travelled in state to Centennial Park. There, he\u2019d soon proclaim Australia a nation. A couple of hours later, as the sun rose in South Africa, other Lancers were also rising for duty. But the troopers there weren\u2019t preparing for parades\u2014they were too busy fighting the Boers.<\/p>\n Before the turn of the new century, a squadron of volunteers had paid their own way to travel to England and train with the Dragoon Guards. Those soldiers were on their way back to Australia when the ship docked at Capetown. Between the troopers\u2019 leaving London and arriving in South Africa, the Empire had declared war on the Boers. But as the ship docked on 2 November 1889 a telegram<\/a> from the NSW Premier, Sir William Lyne, was rushed aboard.<\/p>\n There\u2019d been a major political debate back in Sydney. Many believed if the Empire was at war, NSW was too. They insisted the squadron should disembark and fight. Others, including many conservatives, felt the quarrel between the free Dutch settlers (who\u2019d left the Empire to win and establish their own land) and the English settlers of the Cape was none of Australia\u2019s business.<\/p>\n Seventy-two Lancers ignored the strong hints of their government to return. Instead, they disembarked from the SS Nineveh and went off to fight the Boers, becoming the first volunteers from the Empire to do so. When its hand was forced by the cavalrymen the state parliament back in Sydney supported their action. Later, thousands of Australians would join the small band and serve in South Africa.<\/p>\n For these soldiers, and their supporters back at home, the idea that\u00a0 interests ended at the watery boundary of the continent was ridiculous. For them there was no question: if the Empire was deploying troops, Australia would be there.\u00a0Others insisted there was a choice and what was needed was careful consideration before force was deployed abroad. It lingers today.<\/p>\n The argument’s become the touchstone of an issue that\u2019s continued to bedevil our country\u2019s military commitments ever since: what, exactly, are Australia\u2019s interests and where should we fight? If everyone could agree what those concerns actually are, there\u2019d be no requirement for any Parliamentary debates\u2014ever. Yet ironically, it\u2019s exactly the need for genuine debate and argument that ensures no government is ever likely to allow them to take place. No Prime Minister ever wants to risk having their judgement overturned as happened in the past.<\/p>\n After all, the country voted \u2018no\u2019, emphatically and decisively, not just once but twice when asked if conscription should be introduced during WWI. Twenty years later Prime Minister John Curtin (who\u2019d previously opposed the issue) vacillated before finally bowing to his American master. Douglas Macarthur, wanted the diggers for mopping up tasks, including a fight in Borneo (although definitely not in the Philippines). Even at the time this was declared \u2018an unnecessary war<\/a>\u2019. The later small deployments of professional soldiers to Borneo and Korea didn\u2019t provoke much outrage back in Australia, although the subsequent contribution to Vietnam left deep and continuing scars<\/a>.<\/p>\n And today? The political reality is, quite simply, that politicians from the main political parties have no desire to see any genuine debate take place.<\/p>\n