{"id":15805,"date":"2014-09-16T06:00:24","date_gmt":"2014-09-15T20:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=15805"},"modified":"2014-09-17T09:50:47","modified_gmt":"2014-09-16T23:50:47","slug":"islamic-state-not-unique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/islamic-state-not-unique\/","title":{"rendered":"Islamic State: not unique"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Flag<\/a>Listening to the hyperbole that characterises much of the commentary on the rise of the Islamic State (IS), one would be forgiven for thinking that the world is witnessing an historical aberration in the Middle East\u2019s \u2018fertile crescent\u2019. That broad sentiment is captured by the exasperated words of US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel: \u2018Oh, this is beyond anything that we\u2019ve seen\u2019.<\/a> I disagree. In his address outlining the US strategy against IS, President Obama declared: \u2018ISIL is a terrorist organization, pure and simple. And it has no vision other than the slaughter of all who stand in its way\u2019.<\/a> I don\u2019t think that\u2019s entirely accurate either.<\/p>\n

Fundamentally, the IS playbook reflects the application of core principles of modern insurgency thinking. One need only read the works of Mao Tse-Tung, Che Guevara, Ho Chi Minh and a litany of others to find broad agreement on the \u2018strategic essentials\u2019 of guerrilla warfare:<\/p>\n