{"id":16545,"date":"2014-10-24T12:15:43","date_gmt":"2014-10-24T01:15:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=16545"},"modified":"2014-10-27T09:59:29","modified_gmt":"2014-10-26T22:59:29","slug":"what-future-for-the-australian-defence-industry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/what-future-for-the-australian-defence-industry\/","title":{"rendered":"What future for the Australian defence industry?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Recent events, rumours and reports have cast a light on the future of Australia\u2019s defence industry. High-profile considerations have centred on shipbuilding and submarines with the ongoing Senate Economics References Committee Inquiry, ministerial and prime-ministerial positioning for a \u2018Japanese solution\u2019 to Australia\u2019s future submarine, and the ongoing debate about costs and economic benefits.<\/p>\n
But it\u2019s also important to step back and consider the future of the broader industry. What\u2019s the current status of the local defence industry? How does it compare with that in other jurisdictions? Is defence-related industry intrinsically different to other sections of the economy? Where are we headed, and is that a good place?<\/p>\n
If we take those questions in reverse order it\u2019s clear we don\u2019t know where we\u2019re headed. We\u2019re on a mystery tour and no-one seems to care where it might end. Will it be possible to come back? Decisions on military acquisitions and support seem to be made on the basis of the balance sheet rather than any deeper consideration of strategic importance. Repeatedly, statements are made that the ADF needs to get the best capability for the available money, and that defence isn\u2019t a job-creation programme. At face value both of those statements are sound, but they don\u2019t take into account the longer-term ramifications of in-country industrial activity able to support the defence force.<\/p>\n
Some suggest there\u2019ll be more jobs in Australia because there\u2019ll be more submarines, for example. What jobs? How does such an outcome equate with the smart manufacturing and high-technology economy that successive governments have preached but not practised? Is digging twice as many ditches satisfactory when someone else is making all the ditch-digging equipment?<\/p>\n
Working back up the line of questioning there are fundamental differences between defence industry and other aspects of the economy\u2014just as there are between those in uniform and those in civilian life. Defence industry is there to support the people in the services who may have to put their lives on the line for the protection of the nation. Few in society are called upon to do that.<\/p>\n
Defence industry\u2019s there to ensure that if (or when) that happens those people have the right equipment, and that it\u2019s fit for purpose, properly maintained, and can be repaired and upgraded as and when needed. Defence capability and industry isn\u2019t just an entry on a balance sheet. The question needs to be asked\u2014repeatedly\u2014whether Australian industry should do that, and also whether it can, or can\u2019t. The question also needs to be asked whether the decisions being made harm the ability of the local industry to support the military in the field. Let\u2019s face it\u2014no-one else is going to care about Australia\u2019s military as much as Australians.<\/p>\n
How do we compare with other countries? Quite simply, abysmally. Most countries that fancy themselves as middle powers support their defence industry (see here<\/a>, here<\/a>, here<\/a>, here<\/a>\u00a0and here<\/a>). They see value in doing defence-related activities, particularly the support and upgrade of military capability, in country. They put a premium on the development and retention of local skills. They see a link between indigenous defence-industry capability and the mitigation of strategic and sovereign risk. It appears we don\u2019t. What makes Australia so different that we\u2019re happy off-shoring our industrial defence capabilities? Why do we naively believe that it doesn\u2019t matter, that it isn\u2019t worth the investment, and that someone else will pick up the pieces for us? That\u2019s not sensible. You wouldn\u2019t blithely expect someone else to protect your house when you can\u2019t be bothered to do it yourself\u2014or you want to save a few bucks.<\/p>\n And now for the reality check. What\u2019s the status of local defence industry? Put simply it\u2019s not good\u2014and getting worse. The percentage of contracts being placed into Australia is declining\u2014even to the onshore offshoots of overseas companies. Analysis of the Government\u2019s own data from Austender for contracts placed by the Defence Materiel Organisation (DMO) over the past seven years shows that to be the case. When the data for Australian-owned companies is separated from the other contracts the results are pitiful. The following graphs (click to enlarge) show that to be the case (and remember this is the Government\u2019s own data). True, it\u2019s contract data\u2014not cash-flow data\u2014but it\u2019s difficult to have cash flow without a contract.<\/p>\n