{"id":17469,"date":"2014-12-15T11:00:20","date_gmt":"2014-12-15T00:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=17469"},"modified":"2014-12-16T06:55:38","modified_gmt":"2014-12-15T19:55:38","slug":"defining-the-capability-issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defining-the-capability-issue\/","title":{"rendered":"Defining the capability issue"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n

Defence is big on definitions. If you can define something, you have a better chance of being able to manage it appropriately. So much of the documentation produced by Defence has pages dedicated to the definition and subsequent sub-definitions of concepts. One case in point is Fundamental Inputs to Capability (FICs).<\/p>\n

In the spirit of definitions, let\u2019s turn first to the Defence Capability Development Handbook 2012<\/em><\/a> (PDF):<\/p>\n