{"id":17803,"date":"2015-01-13T14:30:57","date_gmt":"2015-01-13T03:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=17803"},"modified":"2015-01-15T10:18:23","modified_gmt":"2015-01-14T23:18:23","slug":"natural-hazards-a-wicked-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/natural-hazards-a-wicked-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"Natural hazards\u2014a wicked problem"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a> Yes, fire seasons are becoming longer and extreme fire weather is becoming more common, but that\u2019s not the whole story. From much of the public commentary, one would think that there\u2019re any number of simple solutions to deal with this hazard. The management of natural hazards, including bushfire, is a highly complex issue involving all layers of government, the private sector, and the community itself.<\/p>\n Hazards, such as bushfire, exist because they are a natural part of the environment and the phenomenon harms something we value: our lives, houses, livelihood, or amenities. There has been a long historical transfer of responsibility for the protection against such hazards to the government and its agencies on the premise that it\u2019s better to have properly-trained and resourced organisations to respond and protect us. However, as pointed out by the Victorian 2009 Bushfires Royal Commission, that transfer of responsibility has probably gone too far. Individuals are no longer taking sufficient responsibility for their own risk management. It\u2019s analogous to the community not installing locks on houses because we have a police force to address the risk of burglary.<\/p>\n Governments over many years have allowed this risk transfer to continue through perverse incentives that favour people not taking responsibility. In fact, the World Bank noted in a recent World Development Report<\/a> that\u2019s not just a local problem. One of the main reasons why \u2018DRR [Disaster Risk Reduction<\/em>] savings are not always enacted is because political capital is rarely gained from cost-effective DRR measures\u2019. In fact, Healy and Malhotra assert<\/a> that voters reward politicians for delivering disaster relief funding\u2014but not for investing in disaster preparedness. That presents a fundamental challenge to the implementation of the recent Productivity Commission\u2019s inquiry<\/a> into disaster funding arrangements, which in its draft report advocated a substantial shift of focus from funding relief and recovery to funding mitigation.<\/p>\n
\n<\/a>This summer has already seen its fair share of fires in Victoria, South Australia, New South Wales and Western Australia, together with the inevitable debate on whether this is climate change in action. Indeed, it seems these types of events are likely to become more frequent, as the Climate Council has spelt out in its recent series of reports covering the bushfire risks for Victoria<\/a>, NSW<\/a>, ACT<\/a> and South Australia<\/a>.<\/p>\n