{"id":18875,"date":"2015-03-10T06:00:53","date_gmt":"2015-03-09T19:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=18875"},"modified":"2015-03-10T14:54:36","modified_gmt":"2015-03-10T03:54:36","slug":"chinese-public-opinion-on-the-east-china-and-south-china-seas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/chinese-public-opinion-on-the-east-china-and-south-china-seas\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese public opinion on the East China and South China Seas"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Spratlys\"<\/a><\/figure>\n

It\u2019s now possible to do public-opinion surveys in China on everything from pandas to pensions. So why not slip in some questions about the territorial disputes in the South and East China Seas?<\/p>\n

That\u2019s what Andrew Chubb and the Perth USAsia Centre have done with 1,413 adult residents of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Changsha and Chengdu. The job was carried out by a Chinese commercial firm and the questions were part of a survey that also looked at wildlife issues and age pensions.<\/p>\n

The first edition of what\u2019s planned to be a regular survey\u2014if the censors will allow\u2014is \u2018Exploring China\u2019s \u201cMaritime Consciousness\u201d Public Opinion on the South and East China Sea Disputes<\/a>\u2019. This look into the mind of the Chinese public can both confirm the pessimists and comfort the optimists.<\/p>\n

On the basis of this first session with the national psyche, Chubb concludes that \u2018the Chinese public appear to be less war-hungry on these disputes than commonly assumed. Only two policies failed to receive majority approval, one was the official shelve dispute <\/em>policy, the other was send in the troops<\/em>\u2019.<\/em> Solid majorities supported compromise and arbitration, and even \u2018nationalist\u2019 public opinion is judged \u2018surprisingly rational\u2019.<\/p>\n

Among the findings:<\/p>\n