{"id":19770,"date":"2015-04-17T06:00:51","date_gmt":"2015-04-16T20:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=19770"},"modified":"2015-04-16T15:59:53","modified_gmt":"2015-04-16T05:59:53","slug":"the-demise-of-the-defence-materiel-organisation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-demise-of-the-defence-materiel-organisation\/","title":{"rendered":"The demise of the Defence Materiel Organisation"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Following the recommendations of the First Principles Review<\/a>, the government has agreed to move the quasi-independent Defence Materiel Organisation (DMO) back into Defence. In its place will rise the new Capability Acquisition and Sustainment (CAS) group\u2014effectively a pared down version of DMO with its top layer of management removed, but with substantial extra responsibilities in logistics and capability development.<\/p>\n

The report\u2019s language is interesting; the DMO is to be \u2018disbanded\u2019, which sounds like what you\u2019d do with an outlaw motorcycle gang. That might not be accidental\u2014DMO has made more than a few enemies over the years.<\/p>\n

In 2003, the Kinnaird Review of defence procurement then recommended the establishment of a fully independent \u2018executive agency\u2019 to undertake acquisition and sustainment. The goals of the proposed separation from Defence were four-fold:<\/p>\n