{"id":19782,"date":"2015-04-17T09:30:16","date_gmt":"2015-04-16T23:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=19782"},"modified":"2015-04-17T09:39:03","modified_gmt":"2015-04-16T23:39:03","slug":"naval-shipbuilding-thinking-beyond-the-cost-curve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/naval-shipbuilding-thinking-beyond-the-cost-curve\/","title":{"rendered":"Naval shipbuilding: thinking beyond the cost curve"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Is<\/a><\/p>\n

As an early RAN submission to the former Force Structure Committee\u2019s strategic policy consideration of the ANZAC frigate put it so breathlessly, \u2018Australia is an island continent surrounded by sea\u2019. The pleonasm notwithstanding, the proposition\u2019s true.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s equally true that Australia\u2019s sea lines of communication are highly vulnerable in time of war by virtue of their length, their multiplicity and the value of the cargoes they carry.<\/p>\n

The significance of these two obvious features of Australia\u2019s strategic geography is heightened when Australia\u2019s critical dependence on a functioning world economy and the separateness of its political and cultural identity at the bottom of Asia are taken into account.<\/p>\n

Yet judging from some of the more recent commentary on naval shipbuilding in Australia, one could be forgiven for thinking that the sole determinant of its strategic value lay in the economics of construction rather than the ability to sustain the delivery of decisive lethality against any potential aggressor.<\/p>\n

The RAND Corporation has conducted an in-depth review<\/a>\u00a0(PDF)\u00a0of Australia\u2019s naval shipbuilding, reaching a set of conclusions that aren\u2019t, of themselves, surprising. Its principal observations are:<\/p>\n