{"id":19848,"date":"2015-04-21T14:30:31","date_gmt":"2015-04-21T04:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=19848"},"modified":"2015-04-20T12:14:39","modified_gmt":"2015-04-20T02:14:39","slug":"defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Defence Reviews: no Gnus is good news"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Gnus\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Previously<\/a>\u00a0on the Life cycle of the Australian defence review<\/em> we explored the life pattern of this robust herd animal from conception to gestation, birth, infant years and the review\u2019s emergence into full maturity. This time we have to contemplate how reviews age and die. Just as for Gnus in Africa, life is brutal and short on the policy veldt. Many reviews get trampled underfoot by newer processes. Only a few reviews\u2014like Sir Arthur Tange\u2019s Australian Defence Reorganisation<\/em> of 1973 and the Defence Reform Program of 1997<\/a><\/em>\u2014survive long enough to mostly be implemented.<\/p>\n

Why do some reviews thrive while others fail? After writing his own review Sir Arthur Tange spent the second half of his almost decade-long time<\/a> as Secretary implementing his own work. He had intellectual firepower, grit and tenure working for him. Paul Dibb\u2019s Review of Defence Capabilities<\/a><\/em> benefited from Kim Beazley\u2019s tenure as Minister to keep pushing for implementation. The Defence Reform Program (DRP) outlived a number of Liberal ministers but Prime Minister John Howard kept the process on track. In each case these reviews got clear air to be implemented without other reviews chewing their hamstrings. All three reviews intelligently proposed big reform, got powerful political backing and had time to bed down.<\/p>\n

But this isn\u2019t the fate of your average review. Stage six in the life cycle is ageing and predation. By the time review implementation enters its second and third year, entropy slows the momentum for change. It may be that there\u2019s entrenched resistance to making difficult changes\u2014the Strategic Reform Program<\/em>, for example, found it inordinately hard to apply shared services for many back office functions across the Defence tribes. Some review recommendations turn out not to be worth implementing, or in other cases there are political barriers that make implementation near impossible. A number of reviews of the Defence estate, for example, failed because of backbench resistance to selling bases. Reforms of defence procurement have struggled to streamline Cabinet processes for decision-making on equipment. A recommendation needs to be politically achievable as well as look credible on paper.<\/p>\n

Reviews falter when Ministers, officials and implementers move on. When the implementation team leaves, their successors will often puzzle over previous decisions. At that point it becomes easier to adopt a different strategy, and review recommendations can fall by the wayside.<\/p>\n

In the seventh stage of the life cycle\u2014death on the veldt\u2014nothing brings down a big review quicker than a change of government. Thus the Proust Review of 2007 was cut down in its prime by a change of Government and the new Minister\u2019s implementation of an election commitment to launch what became the Pappas Review. Pappas begat the Strategic Reform Program, which was mortally wounded by the time of the 2013 election. Then, the new Government implemented its own election promise for what became the First Principles Review. While the First Principles Review pleaded for a five-year period free of reviews so that it could have a clear run at implementation, the recommendation is unlikely to work. Like all its predecessors, Mr Peever\u2019s review will have to take its chances with elections, changes of ministers and of key Defence staff.<\/p>\n

For many lesser reviews success might be measured by either their implementation or eradication. I was closely involved in managing two reviews done by external experts. The first made sensible recommendations to change aspects of how Defence managed equipment export approvals. It was the political response to a very brief media squall about an export matter. The recommendations were implemented, became the new normal and defence exports are better as a result. The second review was an attempt to handle an unhealthy obsession about the numbers of Defence personnel posted overseas. It made a number of reluctant recommendations that would have reduced Australia\u2019s capacity to manage some important international relationships. At a time when the pressure is for Defence to do more overseas, it seems that the recommendations have been quietly \u2018overtaken by events\u2019.<\/p>\n

Finally we come to the last stage of the life cycle. This is when the memory of some reviews live on, often unintended, as folk wisdom about what a review \u2018did\u2019 to Defence. Think of this as a version of philosopher Gilbert Ryle\u2019s, \u2018ghost in the machine\u2019<\/a>\u2014a term he coined to criticise a view of mind-body dualism that \u2018the body and the mind are ordinarily harnessed together, but after the death of the body the mind may continue to exist and function.\u2019<\/p>\n

In Defence the ghost in the machine of the Dibb review is the folk wisdom that it structured the ADF for \u2018chasing thugs in thongs\u2019 around northern Australia. Actually a fair reading of the review is that it did nothing of the sort. Another \u2018ghost in the machine\u2019 myth is that the Defence Reform Program gutted the Services of logistic support and imperilled Australia\u2019s deployment into East Timor. In fact the opposite is true; the DRP jolted Defence further down the path of being a jointly-enabled force, and necessarily broke a few rice bowls<\/a> in the process.<\/p>\n

And so we say farewell to the life cycle of the Australian defence review, a persistent and much abused creature of the policy veldt. What lessons should we learn? First, Oppositions in particular shouldn\u2019t promise too many reviews. Given the volatility of Australian politics there\u2019s always a risk that such promises will have to be implemented. Second, knowing what it takes to actually do a serious review, it\u2019s predictable that implementation stages will only gear up as we get towards the last months of our three-year election cycle\u2014a politically risky time. Third, reviews slow down Defence administration. In the 12\u201318 months it takes to deliver a product the department is in a fallow period where it\u2019s constrained to make changes because, well, a review is about to be delivered. Pause for a second to think about the implications of this: there\u2019s hardly been a time in the last twenty years when Defence hasn\u2019t been subject to a big external review (yet the criticism is that internal<\/em> management is poor!) Finally, with all that said, if a review really is needed the Tange, Dibb and DRP precedents say that it\u2019s best to go big. On the veldt it\u2019s the big, bad Gnus that run the herd. It\u2019s exactly the same in the Defence review business.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Previously\u00a0on the Life cycle of the Australian defence review we explored the life pattern of this robust herd animal from conception to gestation, birth, infant years and the review\u2019s emergence into full maturity. This time …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":19851,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,1129,700],"class_list":["post-19848","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-first-principles-review","tag-review"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nDefence Reviews: no Gnus is good news | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Defence Reviews: no Gnus is good news | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Previously\u00a0on the Life cycle of the Australian defence review we explored the life pattern of this robust herd animal from conception to gestation, birth, infant years and the review\u2019s emergence into full maturity. This time ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-04-21T04:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-20T02:14:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/10029987723_cf0093bc7a_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"407\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Jennings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Jennings\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/10029987723_cf0093bc7a_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/10029987723_cf0093bc7a_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":407,\"caption\":\"Gnus\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/\",\"name\":\"Defence Reviews: no Gnus is good news | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-04-21T04:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-20T02:14:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Defence Reviews: no Gnus is good news\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548\",\"name\":\"Peter Jennings\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter Jennings\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-jennings\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Defence Reviews: no Gnus is good news | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Defence Reviews: no Gnus is good news | The Strategist","og_description":"Previously\u00a0on the Life cycle of the Australian defence review we explored the life pattern of this robust herd animal from conception to gestation, birth, infant years and the review\u2019s emergence into full maturity. This time ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2015-04-21T04:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-20T02:14:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":407,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/10029987723_cf0093bc7a_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Peter Jennings","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Jennings","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/10029987723_cf0093bc7a_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/10029987723_cf0093bc7a_z.jpg","width":640,"height":407,"caption":"Gnus"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/","name":"Defence Reviews: no Gnus is good news | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-04-21T04:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-20T02:14:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/defence-reviews-no-gnus-is-good-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Defence Reviews: no Gnus is good news"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548","name":"Peter Jennings","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter Jennings"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-jennings\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19848"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19848"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19848\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19852,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19848\/revisions\/19852"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19851"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}