{"id":20421,"date":"2015-05-15T06:00:50","date_gmt":"2015-05-14T20:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=20421"},"modified":"2015-05-14T16:15:01","modified_gmt":"2015-05-14T06:15:01","slug":"uncle-sam-needs-you-silicon-valley","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/uncle-sam-needs-you-silicon-valley\/","title":{"rendered":"Uncle Sam needs YOU, Silicon Valley"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n The perennial problem for governments in grappling with cyber security and cyber policy more broadly has been \u2018how do we engage the private sector\u2019. Those who spend countless hours trawling through policy documents sigh at seeing the immortal words \u2018government must work closely with the private sector\u2019 and then seeing little or no content beyond that statement. However, in recent weeks the Pentagon has seen fit to take some quite radical steps to try and address this issue by opening up its own premises in Silicon Valley. You can almost imagine young tech heads and entrepreneurs running to boot up their cyber defences awaiting the coming US cyber army, such is the deep impact that Snowden has had upon their psyches and wallets.<\/p>\n US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter took the step of embarking on a three day tour of Silicon Valley on the back of announcing his department\u2019s new cyber strategy. At a talk at Stanford University <\/a>he announced the creation of a permanent Defense Department outreach centre, the \u2018Defense Innovation Unit Experimental\u2019. This new centre is aimed at \u2018scouting emerging and breakthrough technologies\u2019<\/a>, and will be staffed by active duty and civilian personnel tasked with recruiting some of the tech industry\u2019s brightest minds.<\/p>\n This will be no easy task for a number of reasons. First, there is an \u2018image\u2019 problem that the military have in this area. The kinds of minds that the military most want are unsurprisingly not those that are most attracted to it, so it\u2019ll take a lot of convincing to attract these kinds of skills and characters, and create a working environment that they are comfortable in. A second issue is that of salaries; top talent in Silicon Valley will be targeted and paid wages that are out of reach to a government department. This is by no means a problem unique to the US. Australia too faces dilemmas of how to attract and then retain the highest calibre of personnel to deliver its cyber capabilities.<\/p>\n At the first White House cyber security summit, in February 2015, also held in Silicon Valley, President Barack Obama stated<\/a> that the Snowden episode had been \u2018harmful in terms of the trust between government and many of these companies\u2019. There is no doubt that Carter\u2019s trip was part of a broader US Government effort to regain that trust. However, this will be a slow process as US companies have been increasingly distancing themselves from US Government security agencies, as market forces drive them to do so. Companies such as Microsoft, Apple, Cisco, eBay, Verizon, Twitter, and Yahoo<\/a> have all taken legal steps to demonstrate to an increasingly privacy-focused customer base that they\u2019re prepared to push back against US government requests for data and assistance. In short, it\u2019s impacted their \u2018bottom line\u2019 and they\u2019re looking to reclaim some of that back. There\u2019s no doubt that building \u2018trust\u2019 back into the relationships with the private sector has become a priority for the US administration.<\/p>\n There are lessons here for all governments in creating a more flexible way of working with the tech sector, first in procurement and second, in profitability. In the cyber domain, not only is the threat consistently morphing, but also the technology and techniques that grow alongside it. Agility is the key to success. However if procurement processes, such as those that exist in the defence world, are slow and cumbersome then it becomes increasingly difficult for companies to justify the time, effort and resource required to persevere. This is especially true of small \u2018start-ups\u2019, where a great deal of the exciting developments in cyber emerge. For these companies \u00a0applying for defence contracts would simply not make sense. Creating a different environment for procurement in this area should be a priority.<\/p>\n