{"id":20659,"date":"2015-05-26T15:00:24","date_gmt":"2015-05-26T05:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=20659"},"modified":"2015-05-25T16:27:19","modified_gmt":"2015-05-25T06:27:19","slug":"australias-humanitarian-response-to-the-syrian-crisis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-humanitarian-response-to-the-syrian-crisis\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia\u2019s humanitarian response to the Syrian crisis"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n A recently released Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade evaluation<\/a> details some successes but also highlights shortcomings in Australia\u2019s humanitarian response to the Syrian crisis. While Australia was an early-responder to events in Syria, overall Australia\u2019s response has been characterised by a lack of effective planning and unpredictability in the availability of aid funding. As the conflict enters its fifth year, Australia has provided 14 separate partners with relatively small amounts of funding across 54 allocations at varying times. This means Australia\u2019s aid partners haven\u2019t had any certainty on when, what and how much they expect to receive from Australia in funding, compromising their impact in the field.<\/p>\n Additionally, the amount Australia has provided in humanitarian aid to Syria from mid-2014 to mid-2015 has dropped from $53.7 million to less than $8.8 million<\/a> and there has been no documented strategy on how or why certain programs were funded. As humanitarian requirements in Syria grow and change due to the complex and ongoing nature of the crisis, DFAT\u2019s lack of a documented strategy regarding the $130 million already spent not only affects the ability of our humanitarian partners to deliver effective programs, but also raises questions regarding the value for money the DFAT aid delivers.<\/p>\n Aid as a counter-terrorism measure.<\/em><\/p>\n A concern for Australia, as well as many other donor countries, has been the threat posed by foreign fighters returning from the Syrian conflict or homegrown terror attacks inspired by the likes of ISIS. Given that many Western countries are now directly involved in military action against ISIS, an increasing number of foreign fighters<\/a> may view their circumstances through the prism of a global war. This places countries in the military coalition\u2014such as Australia\u2014at greater risk of blowback.<\/p>\n Counter-terrorism research<\/a> increasingly shows that punitive measures alone are ineffective in tackling terrorism and that they must be combined with non-coercive programs. A recently published policy paper<\/a> by the Brookings Institute suggests that rather than over-relying on punitive measures to combat terrorism, increasing funding and involvement in humanitarian programs that aim to help people affected by the conflict in Syria has the potential to de-radicalise a significant portion of foreign fighters who were originally motivated not by violence, but by a genuine desire to defend the Syrian people against the brutality of the Assad regime. Older research by AidData<\/a> also suggests that foreign aid has the ability to decrease incidents of terrorism especially when the funding is targeted towards sectors such as education, health, civil society and conflict prevention.<\/p>\n Recent changes to federal counter-terrorism legislation<\/a> are insufficient in themselves<\/a> to deter Australians from fighting in Syria or preventing attacks at home. A more nuanced approach that couples appropriate domestic legislation with a clear humanitarian strategy for Syria, which focuses both on immediate humanitarian requirements as well as medium to longer-term community resilience and development is necessary for counter-terrorism measures to be more effective. Resilience and development projects could include civil society development and increasing the rule of law within liberated Syrian communities, providing children with access to education as a normalising measure and an increased focus on livelihoods and creating economic opportunities in refugee populations.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em>Value for money of Australia\u2019s humanitarian spend on Syria.<\/em><\/p>\n