{"id":20693,"date":"2015-05-27T15:55:17","date_gmt":"2015-05-27T05:55:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=20693"},"modified":"2017-10-26T11:49:00","modified_gmt":"2017-10-26T00:49:00","slug":"the-rohingya-crisis-a-regional-perspective","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-rohingya-crisis-a-regional-perspective\/","title":{"rendered":"The Rohingya crisis: a regional perspective"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>When Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi used the term \u2018pull factor\u2019 in a recent interview, she was reprising an expression coined four decades ago to describe how the promise of resettlement was the reason for the continuing exodus of Indochinese refugees.<\/p>\n Marsudi is well aware, however, that resettlement isn\u2019t why an ever-growing wave of thousands of Rohingya Muslims are turning up on the shores of Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia. It\u2019s simply to get out of Myanmar and find sanctuary\u2014anywhere.<\/p>\n The dilemma isn\u2019t the same, but in the early 1980s the Americans were arguing among themselves whether the later Vietnamese boat people were refugees, or what one controversial report called \u2018economic migrants\u2019: another catch-phrase now back in vogue.<\/p>\n While many may have been, refugee workers found it hard to make the distinction when the escaping families were braving storms and a brutal cordon of fishermen-turned-pirates in a desperate voyage across the Gulf of Thailand to find a new life abroad.<\/p>\n Little could be done to prevent that exodus at its source, but Myanmar\u2019s membership of the Association of Southeast Asians Nations (ASEAN) should give Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia some political leverage to eliminate the \u2018push factor\u2019\u2014even if that does look unlikely right now.<\/p>\n If they can stop squabbling among themselves and dispose of the mantra that member states should not interfere in each other\u2019s internal affairs, they\u2019d have every right to press Myanmar to repeal the 1982 law which rescinded Rohingya citizenship after centuries of residence in western Rakhine.<\/p>\n While the three governments have been rightfully criticized for keeping thousands of \u2018migrants\u2019 floating offshore in dire conditions, mounting a humanitarian operation shouldn\u2019t obscure the fact that Naypyidaw is allowing the burden of an uncompromising policy to land squarely on its neighbours.<\/p>\n Thailand has good reason to worry. It was only the promise of resettlement that persuaded it to take in the Indochinese refugees in the 1970s and 1980s. But that hasn\u2019t always applied to the Karen, 120,000 of whom are still living in nine camps along the Thailand-Myanmar border.<\/p>\n Overseen by the military, Myanmar\u2019s civilian administration may have reluctantly agreed to attend Friday\u2019s summit in Bangkok. But in refusing to even acknowledge the word \u2018Rohingya,\u2019 it seems to be saying that finding a permanent solution isn\u2019t their problem.<\/p>\n