{"id":20789,"date":"2015-06-02T06:00:43","date_gmt":"2015-06-01T20:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=20789"},"modified":"2015-06-01T17:05:32","modified_gmt":"2015-06-01T07:05:32","slug":"do-you-know-the-way-to-shangri-la","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/do-you-know-the-way-to-shangri-la\/","title":{"rendered":"Do you know the way to Shangri-La?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n The Asian security dialogue is about verbal jabs and thought balloons. And policy signalling and point scoring.\u00a0And, ideally, some meeting of minds, reaching towards actual agreement.<\/p>\n The Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, the 14th Asia Security Summit, had plenty of the usual show and shove.<\/p>\n Compared to the last couple of years, though, the verbal biffo from the Chinese delegation was dialed down a few notches. Having been busy creating new geographic features in the South China Sea, terraforming with mountains of sand, the Chinese at Shangri-La seemed keen to judge the effect of their recent show, rather than do much shoving.<\/p>\n What response would they get to their fast build towards a fait accompli? The leader of the Chinese delegation was a Navy man, so they came prepared.\u00a0The relative calm of China’s pushback suggested a certain comfort with the jabs they got.<\/p>\n The shoving from the ASEAN side was as vigorous as you’re likely to get from ASEAN, especially the strictures delivered by Malaysia<\/a>\u00a0and Singapore<\/a>.\u00a0Australia joined the fray via the speech by Defence Minister<\/a>, Kevin Andrews,\u00a0in private bilaterals and in the trilateral with Japan and the US.<\/p>\n Australia has sent its Defence Minister to every Shangri-La Dialogue since its inception in 2001\u2014a record matched only by Japan and the host, Singapore.<\/p>\n The routine is well established. What has come on strongly in the last few years is the annual sidelines trilateral between the US Defence Secretary and the Defence Ministers of Australia and Japan.<\/p>\n The US Defence Secretary Ashton Carter<\/a> said that\u00a0‘America\u2019s trilateral networks are blossoming’. And the first blossom he listed was the trilateral with Japan and Australia.<\/p>\n From the moment it took office, the Abbott Government has inserted more iron in the idiom in talking about China’s territorial ambitions, certainly when compared to the cautious restraint of the previous Labor Government.\u00a0The trilateral process\u2014both Foreign and Defence Minister versions\u2014has been a key venue for developing that\u00a0idiom<\/a>.<\/p>\n Australia\u2019s rhetoric has shifted beyond promoting freedom of navigation and secure sea lanes to specific warnings to China about altering the status quo.<\/p>\n The trilateral poking of China is done by the Foreign and Defence Ministers. The US President and the Prime Ministers of Japan and Australia get to take the trilateral high road<\/a>.<\/p>\n