{"id":20826,"date":"2015-06-03T14:30:07","date_gmt":"2015-06-03T04:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=20826"},"modified":"2015-06-03T16:14:20","modified_gmt":"2015-06-03T06:14:20","slug":"south-china-sea-the-problem-of-the-marine-environment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-the-problem-of-the-marine-environment\/","title":{"rendered":"South China Sea: the problem of the marine environment"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>China\u2019s dredging activities in the South China Sea are significantly disrupting the region\u2019s marine environment. As James Bortley reminds us<\/a>, \u2018the Spratly Islands\u2019 immense biodiversity cannot be overlooked\u2019.<\/p>\n In April the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs pointed out that China\u2019s reclamation activities in the South China Sea were causing \u2018irreversible and widespread damage to the biodiversity and ecological balance<\/a>‘.<\/p>\n The statement<\/a> noted that China\u2019s activities have so far caused destruction of \u2018over 300 hectares of coral reef systems, amounting to an annual economic loss of US$100 million\u2019. The damage extends beyond the artificial islands into the waters of surrounding littoral states.<\/p>\n China was criticised for \u2018tolerating harmful practices and harvesting of endangered species\u2019 that are protected under the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.<\/p>\n In pursuing its reclamation activities China should look to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS), to which it\u2019s a party. Article 206 of UNCLOS states the following:<\/p>\n When States have reasonable grounds for believing that planned activities under their jurisdiction or control may cause substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment, they shall, as far as practicable, assess the potential effects of such activities on the marine environment and shall communicate reports of the results of such assessments in the manner provided in article 205.[Article 205 refers to an obligation to publish reports.]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n There\u2019s also a requirement under customary international law<\/a> to undertake an environmental impact assessment\u2014although the exact scope and content isn\u2019t clear\u2014where there\u2019s a risk that the proposed activity may have a significant adverse impact in a transboundary context.<\/p>\n It\u2019s surprising we haven\u2019t seen environmental groups, mounting the kind of protests in the South China Sea that we saw a few years ago against Arctic oil exploration.<\/p>\n In September 2013, Greenpeace International used the Arctic Sunrise<\/em> to stage a protest directed against an offshore fixed platform in the Barents Sea. The Russian coast guard intervened and detained two activists who\u2019d climbed the platform.<\/p>\n In the Russian Federation\u2019s exclusive economic zone, authorities of the Russian Federation took over control and detained the Arctic Sunrise<\/em>, flying the Dutch flag, and took it to the port of Murmansk.<\/p>\n The crew of 30 persons were charged with the crime of piracy under Russian law and put in pre-trial detention.<\/p>\n In October that year, the Netherlands submitted the dispute to the arbitral procedure provided for in UNCLOS. In spite of the non-participation of the Russian Federation, the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea prescribed that the Russian Federation was to immediately release ship and crew upon the posting by the Netherlands of a financial security.<\/p>\n In December 2013, the Russian Federation granted amnesty<\/a> to the \u2018Arctic 30\u2019 and they were all able to leave the country.<\/p>\n One wonders about China\u2019s reaction should any environmental NGO\u2019s send protest ships as part of a campaign against reclamation activities, and how Beijing would view any subsequent legal action under UNCLOS if protestors were arrested.<\/p>\n China may well find it politically awkward to respond to non-state environmental protest ships, as opposed to grey hulled vessels.<\/p>\n At this weekend\u2019s Shangri-La Dialogue Admiral Sun Jianguo, the People’s Liberation Army’s deputy chief of general staff, stated<\/a> that apart from \u2018meeting the necessary defense needs\u2019, China was carrying\u00a0 out construction on some islands and reefs in the South China Sea to better perform China\u2019s international responsibilities and obligations regarding\u2014among other purposes\u2014environmental protection.<\/p>\n We should therefore be taking this issue up directly with China, asking them whether it\u2019s conducted any environmental impact assessments for their reclamation work to date, and if so what their findings show. This may at least put a pause on the frenetic reclamation activities.<\/p>\n