{"id":20883,"date":"2015-06-05T10:53:05","date_gmt":"2015-06-05T00:53:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=20883"},"modified":"2015-06-09T14:16:47","modified_gmt":"2015-06-09T04:16:47","slug":"australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia and the Freedoms of Navigation"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Two<\/a><\/p>\n

Ringed as we are by archipelagos, freedoms of navigation and overflight (FON) are extremely important to Australia.<\/p>\n

The archipelagic sea lanes (ASL) passage introduced by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) guarantees the non-suspendable right of ships and aircraft to transit through the waters of an archipelagic state, such as Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and the Philippines, provided they use ASLs designated by the archipelagic state. Or, if no such lanes have been designated, transit is allowed along routes normally used for international navigation or overflight.<\/p>\n

Only Indonesia<\/a> has so far designated ASLs. However, these are just a partial designation as the designated ASLs only provide for a north-south transit and there is no east-west sea lane through the Java and Flores seas. Because\u00a0this is a route normally used for international navigation, Australia, the\u00a0US and possibly other countries continue to exercise their right of ASL passage through these seas, although this appears contrary to Indonesian regulations.<\/p>\n

Unlike the US, Australia doesn\u2019t have a formal FON program, and we rarely follow the US example of formally protesting \u2018excessive claims\u2019 to maritime jurisdiction. The US is the only country in the world with a formal FON program. It has three elements: bilateral and multilateral consultations with other governments that may be planning new claims regarded as contrary to international law; diplomatic representations and protests; and operational assertions of rights by US military units. The philosophy of the US FON program is that if claims and constraints aren\u2019t challenged, they may over time be considered\u00a0accepted by the international community<\/p>\n

During the fiscal year 2014, the US conducted operational assertions<\/a> to challenge excessive maritime claims by the following regional countries: China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Maldives, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Taiwan and Vietnam. The claims by Indonesia challenged by the US included the partial designation of archipelagic sea lanes, and the requirement for prior notification by foreign warships to enter Indonesia\u2019s territorial sea and archipelagic waters.<\/p>\n

According to the US Maritime Claims Reference Manual<\/a>, three claims made by Australia have been protested by the US. These include Australia\u2019s establishment of territorial sea straight baselines and declaration of Anxious, Encounter, Lacepede and Rivoli Bays as historic bays. The US doesn\u2019t recognise these claims and has lodged a diplomatic protest against them. However, while the US routinely conducts FON operations against historic bays elsewhere in the world, it has not undertaken them against the bays claimed by Australia. Secondly, the US has protested Australia\u2019s claim to an EEZ around the Australian Antarctic Territory.<\/p>\n

Australia\u2019s final disagreement with the US on FON is our introduction in 2006 of compulsory pilotage<\/a> through the Torres Strait and the Great Northeast Channel. This regime doesn\u2019t apply to ships with sovereign immunity, but due to difficulties of navigation in the area, USN vessels still routinely take pilots for the passage of the strait. However, in requesting a pilot, a USN ship will note the \u2018request is voluntary and not based on the mandatory pilotage scheme\u2019.<\/p>\n

A noteworthy FON incident involving Australia and China occurred in 2001.<\/p>\n

A Chinese warship challenged three Australian navy ships<\/a> in the Taiwan Strait heading from South Korea to Hong Kong. The incident occurred about two weeks after a Chinese fighter jet collided with an American spy plane over the South China Sea, sparking diplomatic tensions between Beijing and Washington. The Australian vessels apparently declined to change course, saying they were exercising their right to freedom of navigation in accordance with UNCLOS.<\/p>\n

The Australian Government is now believed to be planning a so-called ‘freedom of navigation’ exercise<\/a>, which would involve an Australian P-3 Surveillance aircraft flying very near artificial islands being built by China in the South China Sea. While RAAF P-3 aircraft have conducted surveillance flights over the South China Sea for decades it isn\u2019t clear what this latest gesture aims to achieve other than being a provocation to China. Australia\u2019s direct national interests aren\u2019t involved with overflight in the South China Sea in the same way as they are with navigation and overflight through the archipelagos to our near North.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, China hasn\u2019t made clear which restrictions on navigation and overflight it\u2019s imposing around features it occupies in the South China Sea. When and if it does issue such restrictions, then a diplomatic protest by Australia would be more appropriate than \u2018jumping the gun\u2019 now and flying aircraft into a messy legal situation. As well as provoking China, that gesture would be seen in the region as Australia simply acting once again as a \u2018deputy sheriff\u2019 to the US in the region.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ringed as we are by archipelagos, freedoms of navigation and overflight (FON) are extremely important to Australia. The archipelagic sea lanes (ASL) passage introduced by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":93,"featured_media":20884,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[143,17,52,71,471,31],"class_list":["post-20883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-asia-pacific","tag-australia","tag-china","tag-maritime-security","tag-south-china-sea","tag-united-states"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAustralia and the Freedoms of Navigation | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australia and the Freedoms of Navigation | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ringed as we are by archipelagos, freedoms of navigation and overflight (FON) are extremely important to Australia. The archipelagic sea lanes (ASL) passage introduced by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-05T00:53:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-09T04:16:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/5258362780_56bdb0ccb8_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"457\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sam Bateman\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sam Bateman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/5258362780_56bdb0ccb8_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/5258362780_56bdb0ccb8_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":457,\"caption\":\"Two P-3 Orion anti-submarine and maritime surveillance aircraft from the Japan Maritime Defense Force, left, and the U.S. Navy, right, fly over the Los Angeles-class attack submarine USS Houston (SSN 713) underway in the Pacific Ocean during a photo exercise on the final day of Exercise Keen Sword 2011, Dec. 10, 2010. Keen Sword is a bilateral exercise designed to strengthen military operations between the U.S. and Japan, which remains a key strategic partner in the Northeast Asia Pacific region. (DoD photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Adam K. Thomas, U.S. Navy\/Released)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/\",\"name\":\"Australia and the Freedoms of Navigation | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-05T00:53:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-09T04:16:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/c581e249d34a24c68e74e7145c6be023\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Australia and the Freedoms of Navigation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/c581e249d34a24c68e74e7145c6be023\",\"name\":\"Sam Bateman\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a818b64692a0f8b260f9767884050789?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a818b64692a0f8b260f9767884050789?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sam Bateman\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/sam-bateman\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australia and the Freedoms of Navigation | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australia and the Freedoms of Navigation | The Strategist","og_description":"Ringed as we are by archipelagos, freedoms of navigation and overflight (FON) are extremely important to Australia. The archipelagic sea lanes (ASL) passage introduced by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2015-06-05T00:53:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-09T04:16:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":457,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/5258362780_56bdb0ccb8_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sam Bateman","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sam Bateman","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/5258362780_56bdb0ccb8_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/5258362780_56bdb0ccb8_z.jpg","width":640,"height":457,"caption":"Two P-3 Orion anti-submarine and maritime surveillance aircraft from the Japan Maritime Defense Force, left, and the U.S. Navy, right, fly over the Los Angeles-class attack submarine USS Houston (SSN 713) underway in the Pacific Ocean during a photo exercise on the final day of Exercise Keen Sword 2011, Dec. 10, 2010. Keen Sword is a bilateral exercise designed to strengthen military operations between the U.S. and Japan, which remains a key strategic partner in the Northeast Asia Pacific region. (DoD photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Adam K. Thomas, U.S. Navy\/Released)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/","name":"Australia and the Freedoms of Navigation | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-06-05T00:53:05+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-09T04:16:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/c581e249d34a24c68e74e7145c6be023"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-and-the-freedoms-of-navigation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Australia and the Freedoms of Navigation"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/c581e249d34a24c68e74e7145c6be023","name":"Sam Bateman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a818b64692a0f8b260f9767884050789?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a818b64692a0f8b260f9767884050789?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sam Bateman"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/sam-bateman\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20883"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/93"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20883"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20883\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20929,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20883\/revisions\/20929"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}