Sydney Institute speech in April<\/a>, went further than any previous Australian political leader in her estimate of the Islamist threat. She said it was \u2018the most significant threat to the global rules based order to emerge in the past 70 years\u2014and included in my considerations is the rise of communism and the Cold War.\u2019<\/p>\nOne wonders how well Minister Bishop understands the threat to global order posed by prospect of nuclear war between the superpowers during the Cold War, but let\u2019s leave that to one side. If her view is adopted by the Government as a whole\u2014and some of their policies suggest that this is the case\u2014then we should expect this to be reflected in the White Paper\u2019s definition of Australia\u2019s key strategic challenges.<\/p>\n
It should say that Islamist terrorism is by far the most serious strategic risk Australia will face over coming decades, and hence our armed forces should be designed primarily to defeat it. That would of course have huge implications for our capability priorities, suggesting a major shift away from higher-level air and naval forces towards land forces.<\/p>\n
Of course that isn\u2019t going to happen. Instead, most likely, the White Paper will talk up the IS threat in apocalyptic terms, while at the same time reassuring us that the current low levels of military effort against it, and the planned capability mix, will suffice to keep us safe. Which will be absurd.<\/p>\n
But this won\u2019t be the biggest challenge faced by the drafting team, because they\u2019ll also have to work out what to say about China. This too isn\u2019t a new issue for Australian defence policy, but it has proven difficult for the last two White Papers, and it will be even harder this time. Kevin Rudd\u2019s 2009 White Paper went in hard, coming close to describing China\u2019s rising power as a direct threat to Australia, and earning a stern rebuke from Beijing.<\/p>\n
Julia Gillard\u2019s 2013 White Paper went too far the other way, treating China\u2019s rise as largely benign. This sacrificed credibility here and in Washington in order to placate Beijing. Neither document offered a coherent analysis of the implications for Australia\u2019s security of the most important change in our strategic circumstances for at least forty years.<\/p>\n
Today the reality of a changing regional strategic order, including escalating rivalry between the US and China, is even starker than it was in 2013. But the Abbott Government has so far been as reluctant as its predecessors to address the implications of this for our strategic posture and defence capability needs. Defence Minister Kevin Andrews has acknowledged in general terms the significance of the shift in wealth and power to Asia, but neither he nor anyone else in the Government has begun to explain what this means for Australia\u2019s strategic outlook and our future defence force.<\/p>\n
The credibility of the White Paper will be fatally compromised if it doesn\u2019t address these central issues directly. But the more it says, the greater the risk of displeasing either Washington or Beijing, or both. And the more clearly the White Paper sets out the strategic consequences of the rise of Asia, the harder it will be to argue that the defence program it proposes will allow Australia to achieve in future the strategic objectives we have set ourselves in the past.<\/p>\n
The temptation to fudge and waffle will be almost irresistible; in which case the whole effort will be wasted, and we will need to try again with another White Paper in just a year or two\u2019s time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It seems the 2015 Defence White Paper is only a couple of months away, so the big decisions about capability plans and funding should by now have been nailed down, and the White Paper team …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":20972,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,684,895,471,21],"class_list":["post-20971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-defence-white-paper-2015","tag-islamic-state","tag-south-china-sea","tag-strategy-2"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
White Paper puzzles | The Strategist<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n