{"id":21029,"date":"2015-06-17T06:00:02","date_gmt":"2015-06-16T20:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=21029"},"modified":"2015-06-15T15:17:35","modified_gmt":"2015-06-15T05:17:35","slug":"north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/","title":{"rendered":"North Korea: once more down the diplomatic path?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"North<\/a><\/figure>\n

With the world awash with strategic challenges\u2014including Chinese building efforts in the South China Sea, Islamic State\u2019s on-the-ground victories in Iraq and Syria, and the difficulties still confronting the Iranian nuclear deal\u2014North Korea probably hasn\u2019t received its due level of attention over recent months. But a lot\u2019s been happening, so it\u2019s worth bringing readers up to date.<\/p>\n

First, there\u2019s been a new level of consensus on the increasing nature of the threat. Both American and Chinese assessments point to a substantial expansion of the North Korean nuclear arsenal in coming years. In late February the US Institute for Science and International Security published a report<\/a> providing three scenarios for the future of the North Korean nuclear program. Estimates of the number of nuclear warheads in 2020 range from about 20 to 100. The latest Chinese assessment<\/a>, published in late April, also points towards a larger arsenal than most analysts have previously thought. The Chinese believe North Korea might already have 20 nuclear warheads, and that number might double by 2016 and double again by 2020.<\/p>\n

Second, there\u2019s been a new wave of interest in North Korean efforts to miniaturise its nuclear warheads\u2014an important development, if true, since miniaturisation is key to deployment of warheads atop ballistic missiles. Miniaturisation has been a topic of contention<\/a> before, of course, and the evidence still seems too slim to draw firm conclusions. Still, Pyongyang has done what it can to fan that interest by claiming progress<\/a> in just that area.<\/p>\n

Third, there\u2019s been the North\u2019s advertisement of a new submarine-launched ballistic missile capability\u2014a claim greeted with a degree of scepticism<\/a> by most analysts. Building a reliable SLBM capacity typically takes years, even for rich great powers; and if the recent photographic evidence of a North Korean missile rising from the salty blue can be taken at face value at all, it seems most likely merely to demonstrate ejection from an underwater platform. But positioned alongside reports that the chief of the North American Aerospace Defense Command believes North Korea already has an \u2018operational\u2019<\/a> intercontinental ballistic missile capability, the claims have excited a degree of apprehension<\/a> about the pace of delivery vehicle development that the North is achieving.<\/p>\n

Alongside those developments, there have been a set of political signals about a possible revival of the Six Party Talks. Five of the parties\u2014all but North Korea\u2014got together<\/a> recently in the margins of a separate event in Tokyo. And media reports suggest that an invitation<\/a> has been extended to Pyongyang to return to the negotiating table. The timing\u2014at least in one sense\u2014is propitious: with the talks with Iran scheduled to conclude by the end of June, perhaps diplomatic momentum can be transferred to the North Korean problem at that point. But in another sense, a decision to venture once more down the diplomatic path involves a delicate judgment about North Korean politics: that Kim Jong-un\u2019s regime is sufficiently established to be able to negotiate with confidence.<\/p>\n

Moreover, there\u2019s another factor: is Pyongyang willing to find a negotiated solution to its nuclear program? That\u2019s not a new question either. We\u2019ve been down this path before, with mixed results. The \u2018freeze\u2019<\/a> that resulted from the 1994 negotiations had some utility, but in the long run it gave Pyongyang time to build a uranium enrichment program. The promising Joint Statement<\/a> agreed at the fourth round of the Six Party Talks in 2005 didn\u2019t bear much fruit: it didn\u2019t stop North Korea conducting a nuclear test in 2006. And the \u2018Leap Day agreement\u2019<\/a> in 2012, declaring a moratorium on further nuclear and missile tests testing certainly didn\u2019t constrain North Korean testing of satellite launcher technology\u2014essentially missile technology in civilian guise\u2014nor a nuclear test in February 2013.<\/p>\n

I suppose the bigger question is not whether a diplomatic solution has proved fruitless before, but whether it\u2019s a viable pathway now. Are we better off with another round of talks or not? Deciding that probably turns on what sort of outcome we might realistically expect. We shouldn\u2019t expect to roll back the North Korean nuclear program to the same point as Iran\u2019s. Iran is a long way behind North Korea, which has mastered plutonium reprocessing and\u2014probably\u2014high enrichment of uranium. Pyongyang\u2019s conducted three nuclear tests; Tehran none. So what is it we\u2019re expecting the North to agree to? Comprehensive, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement seems a distant goal. Previous attempts to freeze the program or constrain testing haven\u2019t been successful. Joint statements have proven ineffective. With Pyongyang advertising its recent \u2018progress\u2019 on its nuclear arsenal, perhaps it\u2019s bidding up the price of any negotiated settlement. But there\u2019s also another explanation: it has no serious intention of trading away its weapons.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With the world awash with strategic challenges\u2014including Chinese building efforts in the South China Sea, Islamic State\u2019s on-the-ground victories in Iraq and Syria, and the difficulties still confronting the Iranian nuclear deal\u2014North Korea probably hasn\u2019t …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":21031,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[268,206,86,356,1306],"class_list":["post-21029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-missile","tag-non-proliferation","tag-north-korea","tag-nuclear-weapons","tag-six-party-talks"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nNorth Korea: once more down the diplomatic path? | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"North Korea: once more down the diplomatic path? | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"With the world awash with strategic challenges\u2014including Chinese building efforts in the South China Sea, Islamic State\u2019s on-the-ground victories in Iraq and Syria, and the difficulties still confronting the Iranian nuclear deal\u2014North Korea probably hasn\u2019t ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-16T20:00:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-15T05:17:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/1028111184_d35cc51c6b_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"426\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rod Lyon\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rod Lyon\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/1028111184_d35cc51c6b_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/1028111184_d35cc51c6b_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":426,\"caption\":\"North Korea \u2014 Pyongyang, Arirang (Mass Games)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/\",\"name\":\"North Korea: once more down the diplomatic path? | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-16T20:00:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-15T05:17:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"North Korea: once more down the diplomatic path?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd\",\"name\":\"Rod Lyon\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rod Lyon\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rod-lyon\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"North Korea: once more down the diplomatic path? | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"North Korea: once more down the diplomatic path? | The Strategist","og_description":"With the world awash with strategic challenges\u2014including Chinese building efforts in the South China Sea, Islamic State\u2019s on-the-ground victories in Iraq and Syria, and the difficulties still confronting the Iranian nuclear deal\u2014North Korea probably hasn\u2019t ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2015-06-16T20:00:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-15T05:17:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":426,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/1028111184_d35cc51c6b_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Rod Lyon","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rod Lyon","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/1028111184_d35cc51c6b_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/1028111184_d35cc51c6b_z.jpg","width":640,"height":426,"caption":"North Korea \u2014 Pyongyang, Arirang (Mass Games)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/","name":"North Korea: once more down the diplomatic path? | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-06-16T20:00:02+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-15T05:17:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/north-korea-once-more-down-the-diplomatic-path\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"North Korea: once more down the diplomatic path?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd","name":"Rod Lyon","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rod Lyon"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rod-lyon\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21029"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21029"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21029\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21032,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21029\/revisions\/21032"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}