like to replace its CP-140 Aurora maritime patrol aircraft<\/a>. Australia has already signed deals to replace its similar AP-3C Orions with a mixture of P-8 Poseidon and MQ-4 triton aircraft, at a total approved cost of around A$7 billion. Bluntly put, Canada won\u2019t be recapitalising its aircraft fleets with the sort of money likely to be available. And even upgrades to keep the current fleets flying would have to be marginal propositions. It’s the same story at sea\u2014it’s hard to see Canada replacing its submarines, for example.<\/p>\nGiven the remarkable similarities between the current and past trajectories of Australian and Canadian defence funding, it seems odd that they\u2019re now diverging so markedly. Of course, plans are plans, not reality. Canada could change its mind as the realities of the current abstemious policy sink in and a future Australian government could decide it has better things to do with 2% of GDP.<\/p>\n
The answer might lie in each country\u2019s assessment of its security. One very substantial difference between Australia and Canada is geography. One has an alliance and a long land border with the United States, and the other only an alliance, being at the end of long lines of communication. All other things being equal, Australia has to work harder at alliance maintenance than Canada to be sure of its security guarantee. That probably explains the existing difference in government spending priority, shown by the commitment of just 1% of GDP on Canada\u2019s defence but up to 2% for Australia.<\/p>\n
There’s also the China factor. The security situation on the western side of the Pacific is less sanguine than to the east and Australia is more alarmed than Canada. If it\u2019s serious about fixing the looming defence funding crisis, perhaps Canada needs to learn to worry a bit more.<\/p>\n
This post is abridged from an article in the Summer 2015 edition of <\/em>On Track<\/a> (PDF), the journal of the Conference of Defence Associations Institute, Canada. <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Australia and Canada have similar defence problems. Both have a continental area to surveil and defend; and both front onto three oceans, while having to build their defence forces from the resources of relatively small …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":21148,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,120,272,23],"class_list":["post-21119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia","tag-budget","tag-canada","tag-defence-economics"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Australia and Canada\u2014what price defence? | The Strategist<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n