converging<\/em>. These are not simply big or pervasive changes\u2014they broadly outline our future operating environment and will transform the ways we think, operate, cooperate and contribute as an army.<\/p>\nThe Army doesn\u2019t and shouldn\u2019t have the luxury of choosing the type of war or security operation in which we might become involved. That is a decision for government. But we have to structure for and be competent in land joint war fighting, our unique contribution to national capability. Everything else we might be called upon to do is less difficult.<\/p>\n
Today we see terrorism, intra-state conflict, great power positioning, state instability, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief all at play and all affecting Australia or its interests.<\/p>\n
Because of life\u2019s inherent uncertainties, I want the joint force to be as capable as we can afford, and I\u2019m delighted at the quality of the air and naval forces Australia is building. We will always be stronger working together.<\/p>\n
Our modernisation effort supports Army\u2019s contribution to a broad range of operations. The following are three examples of issues we might consider in how Army does so:<\/p>\n
First, the Army contributes to developing Australia’s key international security relationships, building confidence, and promoting common strategic understanding and interests. The Defence White Paper is likely to reinforce the importance of this ADF role and I look forward to working with our partners throughout the Indo Pacific Region, to align effort, build capacity and enhance cooperation.<\/p>\n
Second, the Army contributes to deterring, and if required, defeating coercion of, or attacks on, Australia and its interests, particularly access to trade and commerce, the lifeblood of an island continent. This includes denying an enemy the freedom to operate within our extended approaches.<\/p>\n
The ability of our Army to contribute to a strategic deterrence effect as part of our maritime strategy will increase with the development of an amphibious capability centered on two Landing Helicopter Dock ships. How Army, as part of a broader team, might support a maritime posture and the potential for the Army to contribute to access and area denial in the approaches to Australia needs also to be carefully considered.<\/p>\n
Third, the Army makes a substantial contribution to the headquarters that might be expected to lead operations aimed at assisting or maintaining the stability of states within our extended approaches.<\/p>\n
In the next 10 years, the Army will see substantial investment in protection and mobility, with projects focused on mission command systems, the introduction of protection from blast for our fleet of light, medium and heavy trucks and the replacement of our combat reconnaissance vehicle and armoured personnel carrier.<\/p>\n
These projects combine to deliver vehicles that are more than replacements for their predecessors\u2014they provide protected weapon systems, which are also a hub for communications, information, sustainment and fire support, enhancing the capacity of a ground force to absorb surprise and achieve tactical success in an era of democratised lethality.<\/p>\n
Understanding the broad parameters of future land warfare environments, and the operating concepts applicable to them, can produce valuable insights to focus our development and enhance the Army\u2019s strategic utility and tactical effectiveness in the defence of our nation and its interests.<\/p>\n
This post is an edited version of the speech\u00a0Lieutenant\u00a0General Angus Campbell delivered at the ASPI Army’s Future Force Structure Options Conference on 25 June 2015.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In my role to lead and prepare an Army to serve its nation, my career experience has developed in me a profound commitment to the value, indeed the necessity, of joint, inter-agency, coalition and allied …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":365,"featured_media":21230,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,488,1321],"class_list":["post-21228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-australian-army","tag-chief-of-army"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
The future of Australian land operations | The Strategist<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n