{"id":21241,"date":"2015-06-26T06:00:44","date_gmt":"2015-06-25T20:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=21241"},"modified":"2015-06-25T17:28:30","modified_gmt":"2015-06-25T07:28:30","slug":"the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/","title":{"rendered":"The path ahead for Army aviation"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Australian<\/a><\/figure>\n

When I started to ponder Army aviation in its totality, I realised that force structure planning and project definition for Army aviation is a bit of a mess. Lest that sound a bit harsh, let me say that most of the elements work okay in practice, albeit with a question mark over a couple. And some of the more egregious problems weren’t Army’s fault. But it’s hard to see much coherence across the spectrum of capabilities and projects. And given that Army spent the period 1999\u20132014 pretty much continuously on operation, the fact that it didn\u2019t manage to have its own utility and armed reconnaissance helicopters in theatre in Afghanistan, often relying on coalition air support instead, suggests some issues.<\/p>\n

Let’s start with the MRH-90 multi-role helicopter, a contender for the replacement for the S70 Blackhawks when fleet ‘rationalisation’<\/a> was the flavour of the month. Fast forward to the present day, and we find the Navy is in the process of taking delivery of 24 new Romeo model Seahawk combat helicopters from the United States, while the Army continues to operate Black Hawks while working to get the MRH90s up to speed. (See here<\/a> for more.) Not much in the way of rationalisation has been achieved\u2014and Army wants something else for special forces.<\/p>\n

Then there’s the Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter, now well over seven years late. When the decision to acquire it was made, the Apache was in service with American and other forces and ready to go. Fortunately, some sterling work from the project team, industry and Army has got the Tiger to where the ADF wants it to be. But it’ll be an orphan in terms of configuration and when it comes time to upgrade the aircraft (according to the most recent public DCP sometime around 2020) we\u2019ll have to decide whether to continue to develop our unique capability or buy something else\u2014either way it\u2019ll be expensive.<\/p>\n

And while we were still faffing round with our Tigers, the French had theirs flying combat missions in Afghanistan, Libya and Mali. That suggests that the local problem wasn\u2019t so much the airframe as the systems architecture we were trying to fit it into.<\/p>\n

At least Army can\u2019t blame others for missed opportunities on UAVs. Its first attempt at the world of UAVs was essentially a case of overreach of ambition, specifications that couldn\u2019t be met, irreconcilable technical problems and, eventually, project cancellation. (See page 182 of the 2008 ASPI budget brief<\/a>.) In the meantime, Army got its hands on ScanEagle and the man-portable Skylark, and discovered that you can do more with less in this space. When the larger and largely contractor supported Heron was added to the ADF mix, it suddenly looked like a pretty handy suite of UAVs. All that was missing was an armed UAV to provide persistent armed reconnaissance and flying fire support. All the noises around an armed drone capability<\/a> suggest that we might soon have one.<\/p>\n

Army also has to work out what its amphibious capability will look like and will have to master embarked aviation operations. And if there\u2019s one place a rationalised helicopter force with overlapping logistics chains would be useful, it’d be on a ship. To some extent with Navy\u2019s MRH90 utility helicopters alongside Army\u2019s will work, but if we want to add ASW helicopters to the mix there\u2019ll be little commonality.<\/p>\n

In summary, Army\u2019s aviation force structure is a mixture of the good, the not-so-good and the \u2018time will tell\u2019. And it has come together in an ad hoc way (and at a painfully slow pace). It’s worth thinking about what a strategic plan for Army aviation would look like. I don’t think it’s too hard. The Army\u2014and the ADF more broadly\u2014needs to be able to do a couple of things well.<\/p>\n

First, it needs to be joined up\u2014not exactly a startling conclusion when \u2018network centric\u2019 and \u2018jointery\u2019 have been catch phrases for years. But it hasn\u2019t obviously been factored highly enough in some decisions\u2014ARH certainly wasn\u2019t a \u2018plug and play\u2019 force element off the shelf. Intra-ADF connectivity, including tactical data links between all of the combat platforms should be a no-brainer.<\/p>\n

Second, Army needs to be able to get to coalition operations and plug into American and NATO compatible networks. And it needs to be able to take its own aviation along, confident that it can work with partners. The easiest way to do that is to source platforms from the same place, with connectivity and compatibility built in. There\u2019s a lot to be said for sourcing materiel from the US as a default position, and buying established and mature platforms through Foreign Military Sales works best of all.<\/p>\n

Being able to plug into American systems just makes sense, and makes everyone\u2019s life easier. If we keep our kit at the same baseline as American forces, interoperability follows. And given that the Navy and Air Force are pretty much on the path of interoperability with the US anyway, moving the Army in the same direction would also make ADF intra-operability easier.<\/p>\n

This post is adapted from a talk given at ASPI’s Land Forces Conference yesterday. The script for the talk is here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When I started to ponder Army aviation in its totality, I realised that force structure planning and project definition for Army aviation is a bit of a mess. Lest that sound a bit harsh, let …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":21243,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[488,1322,853],"class_list":["post-21241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-army","tag-aviation","tag-helicopter"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe path ahead for Army aviation | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The path ahead for Army aviation | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When I started to ponder Army aviation in its totality, I realised that force structure planning and project definition for Army aviation is a bit of a mess. Lest that sound a bit harsh, let ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-06-25T20:00:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-25T07:28:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/20150514adf8518511_057.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"489\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Andrew Davies\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Andrew Davies\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/20150514adf8518511_057.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/20150514adf8518511_057.jpg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":489,\"caption\":\"Australian Army MRH-90 Taipan multi-role helicopters depart an airfield at the beginning of a mission in Shoalwater Bay training area, near Rockhampton, Queensland, during Exercise Blue Dog 2.\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/\",\"name\":\"The path ahead for Army aviation | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-06-25T20:00:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-25T07:28:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08a9125f7af3039520d264e965235a73\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The path ahead for Army aviation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08a9125f7af3039520d264e965235a73\",\"name\":\"Andrew Davies\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bbb47ebb41d4978346dbf2e1d21b992a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bbb47ebb41d4978346dbf2e1d21b992a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Andrew Davies\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/andrew-davies\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The path ahead for Army aviation | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The path ahead for Army aviation | The Strategist","og_description":"When I started to ponder Army aviation in its totality, I realised that force structure planning and project definition for Army aviation is a bit of a mess. Lest that sound a bit harsh, let ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2015-06-25T20:00:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-25T07:28:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":800,"height":489,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/20150514adf8518511_057.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Andrew Davies","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Andrew Davies","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/20150514adf8518511_057.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/20150514adf8518511_057.jpg","width":800,"height":489,"caption":"Australian Army MRH-90 Taipan multi-role helicopters depart an airfield at the beginning of a mission in Shoalwater Bay training area, near Rockhampton, Queensland, during Exercise Blue Dog 2."},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/","name":"The path ahead for Army aviation | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-06-25T20:00:44+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-25T07:28:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08a9125f7af3039520d264e965235a73"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-path-ahead-for-army-aviation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The path ahead for Army aviation"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/08a9125f7af3039520d264e965235a73","name":"Andrew Davies","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bbb47ebb41d4978346dbf2e1d21b992a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bbb47ebb41d4978346dbf2e1d21b992a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Andrew Davies"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/andrew-davies\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21241"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21241"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21245,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21241\/revisions\/21245"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21243"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}