{"id":21356,"date":"2015-07-02T10:40:12","date_gmt":"2015-07-02T00:40:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=21356"},"modified":"2015-07-02T10:41:12","modified_gmt":"2015-07-02T00:41:12","slug":"crowded-waters-naval-competition-in-the-asia-pacific-and-the-adf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/crowded-waters-naval-competition-in-the-asia-pacific-and-the-adf\/","title":{"rendered":"Crowded waters: naval competition in the Asia\u2013Pacific and the ADF"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>Claims that a destabilising \u2018arms race\u2019 is underway in the Asia\u2013Pacific<\/a> have become commonplace and are supported by reports that regional defence spending has surpassed Europe for the third consecutive year. As my ASPI report<\/a>\u00a0released today shows, the corollary of this situation is intensifying naval competition in the region. The implications for Australia and the Australian Defence Force (ADF) are significant.<\/p>\n Decisions on arms acquisitions in the Asia\u2013Pacific continue to be driven by a multitude of strategic rationales and domestic factors. The significant changes underway since 2008 raise questions regarding the primary motivation behind regional naval acquisitions, including their supporting air capabilities.<\/p>\n Maritime disputes between China and its neighbours have increased tensions and affected countries\u2019 military modernisation programs. These tensions have driven the requirement for greater surveillance capabilities and signals intelligence systems as well as more surface combatants with longer endurance and platforms able to launch anti-ship missiles, submarines, and long-range aircraft.<\/p>\n These disputes occur in the context of heightened uncertainty about the future distribution of regional power, particularly between the US and China. Consequently, regional naval arms decisions are increasingly driven by \u2018action\u2013reaction\u2019 dynamics<\/a>\u2014reciprocal dynamics in which developments in offensive and defensive capabilities become an interactive process in which the arms requirements of one party depend upon the known, assumed or anticipated capabilities of the forces of other parties; Those dynamics are manifested in counter-reaction (where one party responds to another\u2019s capabilities) and mirror-reaction (where a party imitates another\u2019s capabilities). In other words, these dynamics display some of the important characteristics of an arms race and show that the Asia\u2013Pacific maritime zone is indeed becoming more contested, and potentially more volatile.<\/p>\n