{"id":21675,"date":"2015-07-21T06:00:38","date_gmt":"2015-07-20T20:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=21675"},"modified":"2015-07-21T09:20:26","modified_gmt":"2015-07-20T23:20:26","slug":"sea-1000-the-wrong-way-to-boost-strategic-ties-with-tokyo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/sea-1000-the-wrong-way-to-boost-strategic-ties-with-tokyo\/","title":{"rendered":"SEA 1000: the wrong way to boost strategic ties with Tokyo"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Two weeks ago, Senator Nick Xenophon travelled to Japan to meet with executives from Mitsubishi and Kawasaki, and key Government officials to politely warn them to not rely on the Australian PM\u2019s \u2018nod and a wink\u2019 as a key to winning the SEA 1000 competition.<\/p>\n With high-stakes South Australian politics in play, he respectfully suggested that they need to come up with the best possible local build package to compete with their French and German counterparts, and that failure to do so may be fatal to any submarine project involvement they were chasing.<\/p>\n The Japanese responded positively and genuinely, giving cause for the Senator to announce that \u2018the Japanese are ready and able to build here<\/a>\u2019. This has left the French and Germans, both experienced exporters of submarines, sharpening their pencils.<\/p>\n Don\u2019t we all just love a good competition?<\/p>\n Later this year Defence will be called upon to examine the competitive evaluation process (CEP) responses. They will then select a \u2018preliminary winner\u2019 on the basis of each contender\u2019s submarine capability, accompanying package (including industrial), \u00a0restrictions (e.g. intellectual property) and price, regarding the commercial and technical risk associated with the offerings.<\/p>\n But it may all be in vain.<\/p>\n