{"id":21690,"date":"2015-07-22T06:00:04","date_gmt":"2015-07-21T20:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=21690"},"modified":"2015-07-21T14:45:34","modified_gmt":"2015-07-21T04:45:34","slug":"south-china-sea-options-and-risks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/","title":{"rendered":"South China Sea: options and risks"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"USS<\/a>The venerable Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC is hosting its fifth annual conference on the South China Sea on Wednesday, Australian time. It’s my privilege to be speaking at the conference on the theme of the international community and the strategic balances in the South China Sea.<\/p>\n

I propose a number of steps which the US and like-minded countries might act upon to develop a more effective shared strategy towards the South China Sea. Five immediate actions stand out as offering a more promising way forward.<\/p>\n

First, the US should seek to extract value from President Xi Jinping\u2019s proposed visit to the United States in September 2015. As with past presidential visits, the Chinese will put an exceptionally high priority in delivering a trouble-free and successful visit which will no doubt aim to strengthen domestic perceptions of the exceptional nature of US\u2013China relations. Washington should make it clear to Beijing that the success of this visit will require a substantive discussion on stability in the South China Sea and a willingness to agree that the interests of regional powers must be accommodated.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s no prospect that China will concede ground on their sovereignty claim to around 80% of the region, but there may be a possibility that China would agree to a complete halt on land reclamation and of \u2018militarising\u2019 current sites if other countries in the region do the same. Going into the Xi visit, the US should start negotiations from the position that no unilateral concessions should be made in an effort to modify Chinese behaviour.<\/p>\n

Second, the US should open avenues for dialogue with Asia\u2013Pacific countries and other parties with interests in the South China Sea. This should especially include countries with substantial trading interests with China, like the Europeans and oil-producing Middle East countries, whose economic life-line depends on unfettered access to the South China Sea. A Washington \u2018Summit of the friends of the South China Sea\u2019 would help to strengthen the consistency of government-to-government dialogue on the issue just as the Shangri-La Dialogue has done in Singapore. China would, of course, be a welcome participant but the effect of this will be to demonstrate that more pluralist countries are better able to negotiate and share interests.<\/p>\n

Third, a key point of discussion in Washington and with like-minded countries should be to anticipate responses that might be necessary to handle a Chinese announcement of an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) across the South China Sea. The need is to learn from what was a poorly coordinated and unsustained reaction to the East China Sea ADIZ announcement in November 2013. There are signs that Beijing will hold back from an announcement of a new ADIZ before President Xi\u2019s September visit, but after that time and as the US begins to focus on its presidential election campaign, it\u2019s possible that China might seek to take this next step aimed at consolidating its control of movement through the region. Care must be taken to ensure that initial responses aren\u2019t allowed to fade, giving way to a form of de-facto acceptance that China exercises a form of sovereign control over the region. It may be worth exploring the idea of declaring an international ADIZ, where ship and aircraft movements are pooled in a shared and openly available platform for situational awareness.<\/p>\n

Fourth, Washington and regional countries should take time to re-think the current language which is often deployed to respond to Chinese behaviour. For example, calls for greater Chinese transparency in defence planning continue to be made, long after the strategic purpose of gaining tight control in the South China Sea is readily apparent. China has long since learned to use the artifice of policy statements as a way to describe its actions. The idea of transparency has lost practical utility as a way of trying to force a more realistic discussion with China on its intensions.<\/p>\n

Finally, some degree of international coordination should take place to sustain a pattern of military overflights and ship passage into disputed areas in the South China Sea. One P-8 flight, no matter how welcome, doesn\u2019t serve to \u2018prove\u2019 sustained international interest in the region. In fact the opposite is true: if there are no follow-up flights from countries that claim strategic interests in the region, this only serves to show the relative absence of deep engagement in the security of the South China Sea. It follows that Australia, Singapore, EU countries, Japan and others with a strategic interest in free access to the South China Sea need to exercise that interest in the form of actual overflights and ship transits on the principle of \u2018use it or lose it.\u2019 What may be difficult to do today will only become harder in the future if a pattern of de-facto Chinese control is established over the region.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The venerable Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC is hosting its fifth annual conference on the South China Sea on Wednesday, Australian time. It’s my privilege to be speaking at the conference …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":21691,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,52,1053,471,31,204],"class_list":["post-21690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia","tag-china","tag-freedom-of-navigation","tag-south-china-sea","tag-united-states","tag-xi-jinping"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nSouth China Sea: options and risks | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"South China Sea: options and risks | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The venerable Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC is hosting its fifth annual conference on the South China Sea on Wednesday, Australian time. It’s my privilege to be speaking at the conference ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-07-21T20:00:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-21T04:45:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/17056531090_4c47be8fa2_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"426\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter Jennings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter Jennings\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/17056531090_4c47be8fa2_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/17056531090_4c47be8fa2_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":426,\"caption\":\"USS Fitzgerald transits the South China Sea\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/\",\"name\":\"South China Sea: options and risks | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-07-21T20:00:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-21T04:45:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"South China Sea: options and risks\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548\",\"name\":\"Peter Jennings\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter Jennings\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-jennings\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"South China Sea: options and risks | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"South China Sea: options and risks | The Strategist","og_description":"The venerable Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC is hosting its fifth annual conference on the South China Sea on Wednesday, Australian time. It’s my privilege to be speaking at the conference ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2015-07-21T20:00:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-21T04:45:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":426,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/17056531090_4c47be8fa2_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Peter Jennings","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter Jennings","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/17056531090_4c47be8fa2_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/17056531090_4c47be8fa2_z.jpg","width":640,"height":426,"caption":"USS Fitzgerald transits the South China Sea"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/","name":"South China Sea: options and risks | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-07-21T20:00:04+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-21T04:45:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/south-china-sea-options-and-risks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"South China Sea: options and risks"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/fa4e2bf870963c9c47a6b86c5c08a548","name":"Peter Jennings","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05b37bcdeef0bd9074f96dc18c547536?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter Jennings"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/peter-jennings\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21690"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21690"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21690\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21693,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21690\/revisions\/21693"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}