{"id":22685,"date":"2015-09-29T06:00:01","date_gmt":"2015-09-28T20:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=22685"},"modified":"2015-09-28T09:27:18","modified_gmt":"2015-09-27T23:27:18","slug":"oz-india-this-time-its-different","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/oz-india-this-time-its-different\/","title":{"rendered":"Oz\u2013India: this time it\u2019s different"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
<\/a>Worry about the sharemarket when cabbies offer hot buying tips. Quit the market when brokers claim: \u2018this boom is different!\u2019<\/p>\n The claim history has been defeated\u2014\u2018This time it\u2019s different!\u2019\u2014is ever an alarm.<\/p>\n With that noted, turn to the central argument of these columns on India and Australia: Yes, indeed! This time it\u2019s different for the Oz\u2013India relationship.<\/p>\n The boom\u2013bust market cycle looks similar to the relationship ups and downs. This time, though, Australia and India can do the deeds to match the words, reaching for a closer and more interesting future.<\/p>\n To mount a \u2018this-time-it\u2019s-different case\u2019 is to confront the astigmatism affliction: the weak or distorted view of reality so often evident over 70 years.<\/p>\n The way Canberra and New Delhi have viewed or framed each other is a long story of policy differences compounded by distortions and disturbances and lots of distrust.<\/p>\n The differences have been real enough. Then add the astigmatism\u2014that inability to see each other clearly. The understanding gap became a habit of low expectations, influencing process and effort: too hard to do, too little return.<\/p>\n This time it\u2019s different because the stakes are rising quickly. The incentives to get it right can modify the recurring down cycle.<\/p>\n Claiming it\u2019ll go differently this time means confronting the consistent history of Oz\u2013India disagreement. We\u2019re not talking about any agreement to disagree\u2014think instead of diplomatic daggers and bad tempered cross purposes.<\/p>\n The list is long: the Cold War, non-alignment<\/a>, approaches to the Soviet Union, nuclear non-proliferation, India\u2019s nuclear weapons status, APEC,\u00a0the World Trade Organisation and the Doha round and farm trade. Even the early attempts at Indian Ocean regionalism were defined by Oz\u2013India fights rather than any meeting of minds. Until recently, alliance with the US was close to the top of the catalogue. Different views, different realities in every case.<\/p>\n The history list is not to argue that Australia always gets it wrong. I went against many in the Oz commentariat by arguing that Australia\u2019s non-proliferation interests in the region and the NPT commitment were more important than India\u2014that we shouldn\u2019t sell uranium to India. Put me on the losing side<\/a> of that one.<\/p>\n Beyond uranium\/nukes, this was about the need for Australia to have clear-sighted arguments with India about regional and national interests\u2014the ability to say \u2018No\u2019. This month\u2019s parliamentary report<\/a> on the nuclear deal with India suggests Australia now has trouble even saying \u2018Yes, but’.<\/p>\n Uranium was one of the few fights between Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd that was actually about foreign policy: Julia in the India-importance-colours rolled Rudd\u2019s<\/a> no-sale stance. The Gillard decision was an Australian nod, even bow, to India\u2019s status<\/a>.<\/p>\n Resolving the uranium schism allowed Gillard\u2019s Defence White Paper to embrace the new strategic vision<\/a> of the Indo-Pacific.<\/p>\n The Abbott White Paper was set to repeat the Indo-Pacific mantra; expect the Turnbull White Paper to do the same.<\/p>\n India long framed Australia as a dominion\u2014Brit lackey, Yank stooge. That view of Australia as constant client should improve as India draws closer to the US. My optimistic rendering sees scope for Oz\u2013India strategic convergence<\/a> as New Delhi treats Australia as something more than an obedient subaltern.<\/p>\n The convergence road, though, is long and bumpy\u2014and the difficulties confronting the US and India are a larger version of the same story.<\/p>\n