\u2018Politically, Australia is still stuck in 20th century mode. It is a monarchy with a head of state in London, and all its security arrangements are Cold War relics, whereby they take orders from Washington.\u00a0Australia is out of sync with the emerging geopolitical environment of Asia today. Until Australia fixes this anomaly and moves into the 21st century, it is hard for Indonesia and the rest of Asia to take Australia more seriously.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Those comments hit two key points. First, ASEAN was in part created to keep countries like Australia out <\/em>of regional affairs, not to be a vehicle for their potential inclusion\u2014Southeast Asia for Southeast Asians. This post-colonial mind-set remains prevalent today, and while members may disagree on a huge range of issues, they remain in fierce agreement that they alone get to delineate what ASEAN is for. Notwithstanding the deep and enduring transregional alliances that many members of ASEAN maintain, the project of regional resilience was intended to be a statement about indigenous self-help as a vehicle for both mutual respect and self-respect.<\/p>\nSecond, arguing the inevitability of Australia\u2019s membership of ASEAN pre-supposes that Southeast Asia would even want <\/em>Australia to accede. Realism suggests this is so unlikely as to be in the realm of fantasy. Australia is viewed as fundamentally not of the region\u2014tied by history and choice to the very centres of power that ASEAN was in part constructed to hold at arm\u2019s length. Any Australia-led effort to promote the renegotiation of membership obligations to accommodate Australia\u2019s membership would be seen as evidence of this difference and strengthen the hand of those who would want to see Australia excluded.<\/p>\nAustralia\u2019s relationship with Southeast Asia is clearly of great importance, but the solution isn\u2019t as simple as the binary \u2018in or out of ASEAN\u2019 choice suggests. Australia must manage its regional and extra regional interests in a way that pays heed to the fact that Australia neither presents itself as Southeast Asian nor is perceived as such in the region. This isn\u2019t an insurmountable obstacle to more effective, more meaningful and more substantive cooperation between Australia and its northern neighbours\u2014and much more can and should be done in this field\u2014but it\u2019s a call for realism. The future of Australia\u2019s relations with members of ASEAN is too important to be jeopardised by confusing the clear need for closer relations with a desire for membership.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a thought-provoking piece, Graeme Dobell outlines not only why he thinks Australia should join ASEAN but also, more daringly, why it will join ASEAN. The argument raises important questions of Australia\u2019s relationship with Southeast …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":422,"featured_media":22807,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[189,17,467],"class_list":["post-22804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-asean","tag-australia","tag-multilateralism"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
In defence of distance: why Australia should stay out of ASEAN | The Strategist<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n