{"id":23169,"date":"2015-11-03T14:30:08","date_gmt":"2015-11-03T03:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=23169"},"modified":"2015-11-03T16:03:23","modified_gmt":"2015-11-03T05:03:23","slug":"iraq-lessons-learned-intelligence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iraq-lessons-learned-intelligence\/","title":{"rendered":"Iraq lessons learned: intelligence"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n John Howard didn\u2019t have too much support from Australian intelligence in deciding to go to war against Iraq.<\/p>\n The Prime Minister got just enough cover from the Office of National Assessments to meet political needs. Beyond politics, though\u2014as a basis for war\u2014the Oz intelligence supporting war was thin stuff.<\/p>\n So thin, in fact, it was wrong. Iraq didn\u2019t pose a threat because it didn\u2019t have the Weapons of Mass Destruction that was the c<\/em>asus belli <\/em>used by the US, Britain and Australia.<\/p>\n Intelligence is the starting point for this lessons learned exercise, as discussed in the previous column<\/a>.<\/p>\n Two documents give the details: the Iraq report by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence<\/a> at the end of 2003 \u00a0(in those days formally titled Joint Committee on ASIO, ASIS and DSD) and then Philip Flood\u2019s Inquiry into Australian Intelligence Agencies<\/a> in 2004.<\/p>\n The Intelligence Committee found the Defence Intelligence Organisation was sceptical throughout about Iraq\u2019s Weapons of Mass Destruction; on the other hand, the Office of National Assessments (inside the PM\u2019s Department) hardened its line as Howard marched closer to invasion.<\/p>\n The Committee commented on a sudden variation in September 2002, \u2018in the nature and tone\u2019 of ONA\u2019s view on Iraq\u2019s WMD:<\/p>\n \u2018It is so sudden a change in judgement that it appears ONA, at least unconsciously, might have been responding to \u2018policy running strong\u2019.\u2019 And by that stage, John Howard was indeed running strong with George W. Bush.<\/p>\n On Iraq’s WMD, Philip Flood lamented ‘a failure rigorously to challenge preconceptions or assumptions about the Iraqi regime’s intentions…there is little evidence that systematic and contestable challenging was applied in a sustained way to analysts’ starting assumptions.’<\/p><\/blockquote>\n If you want all this short and sharp, turn to a fine public servant who spent many years in Parliament House serving Parliamentary inquiries\u2014and writing much of what came to be tabled as committee findings.<\/p>\n Margaret Swieringa was secretary of the Parliamentary Intelligence Committee from 2002 to 2007 and was the engine for the Iraq report. \u00a0In retirement, she offered this terse judgement on whether John Howard<\/a> \u2018lied\u2019 about intelligence on Iraq\u2019s Weapons of Mass Destruction: \u2018None of the government’s arguments were supported by the intelligence presented to it by its own agencies. None of these arguments were true.\u2019<\/p>\n This is the way Swieringa summarised the Iraq findings of the Joint Intelligence Committee:<\/p>\n So the lessons learned on intelligence are the sort of stuff they teach recruits in the induction courses, the verities drenched with blood from Iraq.<\/p>\n Intelligence is always partial, and part will be wrong. The stuff that seems too good to be true often seems good because it isn\u2019t true (a truth as important for journalists as it is for analysts).<\/p>\n The key word that runs through the Flood report is \u2018contestability\u2019<\/a> (see also here<\/a>).<\/p>\n Analysts had to be ‘challenged, confronted by different perspectives and alerted to flaws in their arguments.’<\/p>\n In the case of Iraq, ONA ended up building a case for its political master that didn\u2019t really deal with the sceptical questions raised by DIO.<\/p>\n Ironic that such failure resulted in the Oz intelligence community getting big increases in funding for the rest of the decade so it could do a better job thinking about the age of terror.<\/p>\n\n