{"id":23273,"date":"2015-11-09T06:00:57","date_gmt":"2015-11-08T19:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=23273"},"modified":"2015-11-06T16:54:16","modified_gmt":"2015-11-06T05:54:16","slug":"iraq-lessons-the-howard-fib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iraq-lessons-the-howard-fib\/","title":{"rendered":"Iraq lessons: the Howard fib"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n John Howard\u2019s decision to go to war in Iraq was constructed on a fib.<\/p>\n The fib was used repeatedly throughout 2002 and almost to the very start of the invasion in 2003. The fib was that Australia still had an open mind on going to war. The Prime Minister\u2019s fib was that Australia was weighing all the options and had yet to commit to a US-led invasion.<\/p>\n Even at the time it was used, the fib was transparent. In the history of the open secret, the Iraq fib is a fine example.<\/p>\n Use the word \u2018fib\u2019 instead of \u2018lie.\u2019 This is a political distinction (not to be tried when disciplining children or giving evidence under oath).<\/p>\n The fib in its political garb is designed to conceal or avoid the whole truth. There\u2019s a bit of truth within the fib but the assertion isn\u2019t wholly true. The fib is the politics-as-usual version of \u2018being economical with the truth<\/a>.\u2019 Neither a bent untruth nor a straight lie\u2014many shades of shadiness.<\/p>\n The bit of truth in the fib is that if Saddam Hussein had totally and abjectly surrendered\u2014fully revealed that he had no Weapons of Mass Destruction\u2014Australia would, indeed, embrace the option not to go to war.<\/p>\n Short of that, Australia was all in. And committed. Contemplate the neocon fervour of Bush and the boys in 2002 after the successful invasion of Afghanistan. Saddam\u2019s history and his weak and confused signals of compliance showed how hard it would be to get Washington to take Iraq\u2019s \u2018yes\u2019 for an answer. This was a war of choice that the Bush White House embraced. Australia\u2019s embrace was less enthusiastic but it was early and ardent.<\/p>\n