{"id":23514,"date":"2015-11-25T06:00:04","date_gmt":"2015-11-24T19:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=23514"},"modified":"2015-11-24T09:41:47","modified_gmt":"2015-11-23T22:41:47","slug":"us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/","title":{"rendered":"US\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Great<\/a><\/p>\n

The recent freedom of navigation operation undertaken by the USS Lassen in the South China Sea advertises a new sharper edge to US\u2013China relations. Some analysts have begun to write about a \u2018tipping point\u2019 in the relationship (see here<\/a> and here<\/a>); media reports sometimes talk of a relationship in crisis<\/a>. It\u2019s not that bad\u2014yet\u2014but things are getting more serious. To see why, we need to look at the broader regional landscape and then fit US\u2013China relations into that. The US\u2013China bilateral relationship is undoubtedly the region\u2019s most important, but Asia\u2019s no G2\u2014it\u2019s a large theatre with no common front line and a high level of economic interdependence.<\/p>\n

Indeed, we\u2019re moving into a world of uneven multipolarity in Asia. It\u2019s easiest to see the shift by using a long baseline: compare the relative weightings of the major players in 1995 with what they are now. In 1995 US preponderance was so marked that all other players looked like minions. But 20 years later we see an Asia characterised by a number of strong players: China, Japan and India in the top tier; South Korea, Australia, Indonesia in the second tier; and a range of regional states\u2014like Vietnam\u2014in fast-growing Southeast Asia.<\/p>\n

Still, power relativities are shifting more than regional order. Japan\u2019s determined to add some cross-bracing to the current order, seeing that as offering the legitimacy it needs for a larger role. India doesn\u2019t have the influence or the wish to redesign the East Asian order: its growing gravitational weight is still felt most in the Indian Ocean and on the subcontinent. And China\u2019s strategic vision still emphasises a Great Wall, a set of deferential neighbours, and a smaller US presence in proximity to the Wall. But China doesn\u2019t like the current order, which was built at a time when it was weak. It doesn\u2019t believe that, in the long run, the Asian regional order should be shaped in Washington<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The second-tier players are generally too weak to promote their own visions of an Asian order. South Korea and Australia are, in any event, both US allies. Indonesia isn\u2019t, but\u2014like most ASEAN states\u2014it\u2019s disposed to prefer either US primacy to Chinese hegemony or (at worst) a stable great-power equipoise in a peaceful multipolar Asia.<\/p>\n

The US is attempting a \u2018rebalance\u2019 to Asia. But Washington\u2019s conscious of its global obligations (including to Europe and the Middle East), weary after 14 years of effort post-9\/11, and keen to address a range of domestic issues. It knows too that even a successful rebalance won\u2019t restore the US to the degree of primacy it enjoyed in the 1990s.<\/p>\n

So in the long run, the US seeks a modus vivendi<\/em> with a rising, peaceful China. The two countries\u2019 annual Strategic and Economic Dialogue and growing trade figures underline that objective (bilateral trade has grown by 7,550% 1985-2014<\/a>). But read Lawrence Summers\u2019 latest piece<\/a> for The Washington Post<\/em>: \u2018the world\u2014including China\u2014is unprepared for China\u2019s rise\u2019. Summers believes the US still has serious questions to answer in relation to the relationship. Does it want a more prosperous China or a less prosperous one? Does it have a coherent picture of its preferences in terms of China\u2019s policy choices? Does it have a sensible picture of future architectural arrangements?<\/p>\n

Similar questions exist in the strategic field: does the US want a stronger China whose weight is felt more around the region or a weaker China whose weight is felt less? For the US\u2014and Australia\u2014the answer, of course, varies depending on what sort of great power China turns out to be. In the South China Sea we see a coercive power, not a consultative one\u2014a power unwilling to accept international arbitration. Nationalism\u2019s a potent driver in Chinese foreign policy at the moment. Moreover, China\u2019s growing weight is felt most starkly along the Eurasian rimlands, in ways that are corrosive of the current strategic order. The contests in the East China Sea and South China Sea aren\u2019t really about rocks\u2014they\u2019re about hierarchy<\/a> in a future regional security environment.<\/p>\n

And there\u2019s a second level of complication: the US and China have to work out their relationship in full view of the region\u2014a region which includes a number of US allies who don\u2019t want the US to treat China as a peer. They worry that its doing so would imply a marginalisation of the hub-and-spokes structure.<\/p>\n

The good news is that the Thucydides \u2018trap\u2019 isn\u2019t inevitable: rising powers aren\u2019t doomed to clash with established ones. Economic interdependence and nuclear weapons lessen the prospects of war. And military manoeuvring in the South China Sea is still about \u2018signalling\u2019, not conflict. But the bad news is that some form of clash seems increasingly likely. The US can\u2019t move to offshore balancing without spooking its own allies; but China\u2019s idea of the US as an \u2018outsider\u2019 implies just such a shrinking role for the US in Asia. Troubled waters lie ahead.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The recent freedom of navigation operation undertaken by the USS Lassen in the South China Sea advertises a new sharper edge to US\u2013China relations. Some analysts have begun to write about a \u2018tipping point\u2019 in …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":23515,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[189,143,52,1053,31],"class_list":["post-23514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-asean","tag-asia-pacific","tag-china","tag-freedom-of-navigation","tag-united-states"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nUS\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"US\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The recent freedom of navigation operation undertaken by the USS Lassen in the South China Sea advertises a new sharper edge to US\u2013China relations. Some analysts have begun to write about a \u2018tipping point\u2019 in ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-24T19:00:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-23T22:41:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/6268902514_4944ae4261_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"337\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rod Lyon\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rod Lyon\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/6268902514_4944ae4261_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/6268902514_4944ae4261_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":337,\"caption\":\"Great Wall of China\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/\",\"name\":\"US\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-24T19:00:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-23T22:41:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"US\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd\",\"name\":\"Rod Lyon\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rod Lyon\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rod-lyon\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"US\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"US\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape | The Strategist","og_description":"The recent freedom of navigation operation undertaken by the USS Lassen in the South China Sea advertises a new sharper edge to US\u2013China relations. Some analysts have begun to write about a \u2018tipping point\u2019 in ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2015-11-24T19:00:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-23T22:41:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":337,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/6268902514_4944ae4261_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Rod Lyon","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rod Lyon","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/6268902514_4944ae4261_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/6268902514_4944ae4261_z.jpg","width":640,"height":337,"caption":"Great Wall of China"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/","name":"US\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2015-11-24T19:00:04+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-23T22:41:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-china-relations-in-an-evolving-regional-strategic-landscape\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"US\u2013China relations in an evolving regional strategic landscape"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/9b94d45f61c61c15e3313f55e2c145bd","name":"Rod Lyon","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9090df27d0a103459ebfc0282858e8c1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rod Lyon"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/rod-lyon\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23514"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23514"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23514\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23516,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23514\/revisions\/23516"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}