{"id":23857,"date":"2015-12-09T06:00:21","date_gmt":"2015-12-08T19:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=23857"},"modified":"2015-12-08T18:48:28","modified_gmt":"2015-12-08T07:48:28","slug":"the-measure-of-terror-the-2015-global-terrorism-index","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-measure-of-terror-the-2015-global-terrorism-index\/","title":{"rendered":"The measure of terror: the 2015 Global Terrorism Index"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Public awareness of terrorism fluctuates depending on the proximity and level of terror threat. Terrorism came into sharp focus for Australians with incidents such the 2002 Bali bombings and last year\u2019s Martin Place siege.<\/p>\n The recent Paris attacks have reminded us, however, that terrorism is always in our midst.<\/p>\n For three years, the Global Terrorism Index has compiled comparative data on global terrorist incidents. Produced by the Institute for Economics and Peace<\/a> and based on the University of Maryland Global Terrorism Database<\/a>, the Index provide valuable\u2014and sometimes surprising\u2014indicators of the changing drivers and trends in terrorism. The 2015 edition<\/a> (PDF) of the Index draws upon data covering the past 15 years of terrorist incidents, focusing on 2014.<\/p>\n Media coverage of terrorist attacks typically provides information on the fatalities and immediate impact of attacks, and those responsible, when known.<\/p>\n Less easily accessible in the public domain is data on the bigger picture: How active are the groups involved? How far is their reach? Are new groups emerging or splintering off from old groups? What are the trends on location of attacks? Are they increasing or decreasing in number? Who are the targets and are they changing?<\/p>\n The Index provides the statistical basis for some interesting findings.<\/p>\n We are all aware of the impact of terrorism since 9\/11. But 2014 was by far the most lethal year since then, with an 80% increase in terrorism-related deaths from the previous year amounting to 32,658 reported deaths.<\/p>\n Sadly, less surprising is the data on location and lethality of terrorist attacks\u2014Iraq, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria account for 57% of terrorist incidents and 78% of terrorist-related deaths.<\/p>\n Of particular concern is the data on Boko Haram\u2019s high level of activity in Nigeria, which lead to a dramatic increase in terrorist-related deaths\u20147,512 in 2014 up from less than 1,000 the year before.<\/p>\n The report finds that Boko Haram had marginally overtaken ISIL in numbers of terrorist-related fatalities\u20146,644 by Boko Haram compared with 6,073 by ISIL. But ISIL\u2019s broader impact persists, with the Index reporting it was also responsible for more than 20,000 deaths in the conflict zone of Iraq and Syria during 2014. This number isn\u2019t included in the \u2018terrorist acts\u2019 collated in the Index.<\/p>\n