{"id":23908,"date":"2015-12-14T06:00:05","date_gmt":"2015-12-13T19:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=23908"},"modified":"2015-12-14T10:38:03","modified_gmt":"2015-12-13T23:38:03","slug":"australia-into-asean-the-asean-no","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-into-asean-the-asean-no\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia into ASEAN: the ASEAN \u2018NO\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"It's<\/a><\/figure>\n

The Southeast Asian rejection of Australia joining ASEAN is simply expressed: \u2018You\u2019re not from around here. You don\u2019t think like us. You don\u2019t belong.\u2019<\/p>\n

The argument is about identity defined through geography.<\/p>\n

The previous column in this series gave an ASEAN version of the \u2018Yes\u2019<\/a> case for Australia and New Zealand making the Association a 12-nation Community.<\/p>\n

Now for the \u2018No\u2019 case as put by Rodolfo Severino<\/a>, a Philippines diplomat who was\u00a0the Secretary General of ASEAN from 1998 to 2002. His summary of the negative case:<\/p>\n

\u2018ASEAN will say, \u201cYou\u2019re not Southeast Asian.\u201d And that\u2019s all the criterion is, to be a member of ASEAN. You must belong to a region called Southeast Asia, which was invented by Lord Mountbatten by the way \u2013 South East Asian Command<\/a> \u2013 but that\u2019s neither here nor there. The fact is that the region exists now, conceptually, which is the most important thing.\u2019<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Severino\u2019s long held view is that Australia has a \u2018sometimes ambivalent and fluctuating<\/a> relationship\u2019 with ASEAN. He describes the elements of this variable approach as:<\/p>\n