{"id":23967,"date":"2015-12-17T06:00:10","date_gmt":"2015-12-16T19:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=23967"},"modified":"2015-12-17T10:08:46","modified_gmt":"2015-12-16T23:08:46","slug":"letter-from-washington-the-cop21-agreement-and-americas-mixed-reaction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/letter-from-washington-the-cop21-agreement-and-americas-mixed-reaction\/","title":{"rendered":"Letter from Washington: the COP21 agreement and America\u2019s mixed reaction"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n The Paris agreement on climate change is a big win for President Obama, particularly given that he\u2019s invested a lot of political capital in this issue, especially in his second term when he no longer has to worry about having to run for re-election. The outcome of the conference seems to have vindicated his commitment to this issue. To everyone\u2019s surprise, he made climate change an important part of his second inaugural address.<\/p>\n However, despite everyone back-patting themselves galore in Paris\u2014as well as in the White House, once the gavel came down\u2014it\u2019s difficult to see why, given the modest, non-enforceable goals that the 195 countries signed up to<\/a>. It probably has something to do with the fact that following the failure of Copenhagen in 2009, expectations were low that any agreement would actually be reached.<\/p>\n According to a significant number of respected scientists<\/a>, the Paris agreement won\u2019t save the planet from the catastrophic consequences of the rise in temperature of three degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial level which is expected to occur by 2100.<\/p>\n And, more importantly, it\u2019s impossible that the world is able to achieve its Paris conference goal of limiting the temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial level within two decades, which would require the world to give up gasoline-driven cars, coal or gas-burning power plants, and planes and ships powered by fossil fuels. That obviously won\u2019t happen<\/a>. Even achieving the more modest target of 2 degrees wouldn\u2019t prevent climate-related catastrophes for millions of people living in low-lying countries or islands.<\/p>\n Still, while the goals agreed to in Paris are extremely modest\u2014and perhaps they are too little, too late\u2014they are nevertheless a recognition by the international community that something needs to be done.<\/p>\n However, not everyone in Washington sees eye-to-eye with President Obama on that issue\u2014certainly not the Republicans who have little time for his approach on climate change, or anything else for that matter.<\/p>\n The Obama administration has been fully aware of this and, accordingly, it negotiated in Paris for a non-legally binding agreement, i.e. not a treaty, as this would require the White House to present it to the Republican-dominated Senate for approval, where it would be rejected as a matter of course.<\/p>\n President Obama has taken this approach even though recent polls<\/a> clearly indicate that over two-thirds of Americans believe that climate change is real and is caused by human activity. But even more telling, a majority of grass roots Republican polled also agree with this position.<\/p>\n Notwithstanding the fact that the Republican base is shifting significantly on this issue, and that the Paris agreement may not be a treaty, Republican Party representatives of Utah and Pennsylvania have introduced a resolution<\/a> that would require the Senate to ratify any climate change deal. That\u2019s in addition to another threat by a number of Republican senators to block funding for any climate deal unless it\u2019s sent to Congress for ratification.<\/p>\n Already more than half the states are suing<\/a> the Obama administration on the legality of his climate plan, the Clean Power Plan<\/a>. And in a recent opinion article<\/a> in The Washington Post,<\/em> the Republican leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, called Obama\u2019s climate plan \u2018an anti-middle class power plan\u2019 which wouldn\u2019t live beyond this administration.<\/p>\n And while the Republican Party appears to be increasingly out of touch with the general population and even with its own political base, this doesn\u2019t seem to affect Texan Senator Ted Cruz, a rising Republican presidential candidate, who continues to question the scientific consensus<\/a> that human activity is responsible for climate change. Senator Cruz is joined by fellow Oklahoma Republican Senator James Inhofe, chairman of the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee, who referred to the Paris negotiations as \u2018full of hot air\u2019.<\/a><\/p>\n