{"id":23980,"date":"2015-12-23T14:30:10","date_gmt":"2015-12-23T03:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=23980"},"modified":"2015-12-17T12:07:34","modified_gmt":"2015-12-17T01:07:34","slug":"dont-be-complacent-about-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/dont-be-complacent-about-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Don\u2019t be complacent about China!"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>When I first moved from China to Australia in 2011 I was surprised to hear rumblings about the perils of Australian complacency in the face of rapid changes taking place across the Indo\u2013Pacific. Australia\u2019s destiny is tied to Asia and China in particular\u2014this struck me as a given.<\/p>\n The living standards of Australians are inherently dependent on the ability of Australian businesses to continue to make profit and on the region continuing to be without major conflict. The former means increasingly relying on the region to generate profit. The latter means that Canberra\u2019s diplomatic efforts must focus on encouraging the peaceful rise of China and the establishment of a new equilibrium of power acceptable to Australia and others in the region.<\/p>\n Over the past four years, I\u2019ve been confronted with this complaint of complacency in countless conversations about Australia\u2019s ties with China. Many Australian government officials, military officers, business people, university administrators, defence analysts and academics have bemoaned that Australians haven\u2019t made the effort to become China-literate because they haven\u2019t needed to. The resources boom kept living standards high without requiring much effort. Furthermore, changes in education policies around the turn of the 21st century discouraged Australian school children from studying Asian languages.<\/p>\n Most recently, during a closed-door meeting of China Matters in Melbourne, it was apparent to me that Australia continues to miss out on significant opportunities. At the meeting, three very different kinds of questions were probed: How\u2019s Australian business coping with the transforming environment under Xi Jinping? How should the Australian government respond to outreach activities of the Chinese government in Australia, especially among Chinese international students and media outlets? How should Canberra respond to China\u2019s ambitions in the region? All three sessions ended not only with a recognition that it\u2019s going to be even tougher to benefit from engagement with China as ties expand and deepen, but also, if Australians don\u2019t grasp some of the opportunities, they will be worse off for it. The first crucial step in learning how to deal with a different counterpart\u2014one with whom Australia doesn\u2019t share common values\u2014is the hardest. The unknown seems to be an insurmountable challenge.<\/p>\n Starting with the business environment, Australians are missing opportunities because of reluctance to invest in China. Despite the fact that the consequences of China\u2019s economic transformation have been apparent for a decade, Australia\u2019s economic relationship with China continues to be largely transactional (resources or food products are shipped to China). Xi Jinping\u2019s reforms merely reinforced goals set by his predecessor: to make growth consumption-driven rather than investment-led and reliant on the services sector rather than manufacturing. The overwhelming majority of Australia\u2019s GDP derives from the services sector, but services only comprise about 20% of Australia\u2019s exports.<\/p>\n The vast majority of Australian companies are at least 10 years behind competitors who \u00a0invested in China via either wholly foreign-owned entities or joint ventures. Competitors now increasingly include Chinese companies, who in many cases have had (or continue to have) an advantage due to Chinese administrative measures or policies that favour domestic companies. Additionally, today many Chinese business executives are experienced and confident and therefore have no incentive to grant favourable terms in return for the opportunity to learn from a Western partner, as was the case 10\u201315 years ago. Naturally, investing in China carries risk. Many factors, among others the lack of rule of law, compound normal business risks. But due diligence and hedging are better tools than complacency to offset risk.<\/p>\n Moving to the education sector, I\u2019m dismayed that the Australian government and universities don\u2019t make greater effort at outreach among international students to proudly promote this multicultural society, one that thrives on the rule of law and civil liberties such as freedom of speech and the press. What a missed opportunity! Those international students\u2014of which about one-third are from China\u2014contribute vital revenue to Australian universities. However, in the case of Chinese students, many have scant if any interaction with Australian society.<\/p>\n Many Chinese students in Australia rely on Chinese student associations, funded in part by the Chinese government, for their social activities and on Chinese-language media for news and understanding of the goings-on in Australia and the world. Most Chinese language media in Australia are controlled or heavily influenced by the Propaganda Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CCP), which forbids open discussion of issues it deems controversial. According to John Fitzgerald<\/a>, a Swinburne University of Technology academic, the views of Chinese residents of Australia, whether they\u2019re students or migrants, are \u2018massaged in Australia through Chinese-language news and commentary produced in Beijing and rebroadcast through commercial radio stations and other media that have been bought up by businesses acting on behalf of the CCP Propaganda Bureau\u2019.<\/p>\n That means that many (possibly most) Chinese students in Australia aren\u2019t exposed either at social events or in their news intake to issues deemed anathema by the Chinese government, for example contrarian views on controversies in the South China Sea or on minority concerns in Tibet and Xinjiang.<\/p>\n