the transcript<\/a> of the prime minister\u2019s press conference in Tokyo on 18 December. Here the prime minister is speaking off the cuff, but that makes his comments less processed and a little more revealing. Replies to several questions suggest that as prime minister, he, Malcolm Turnbull, relies heavily upon Duncan Lewis\u2019s advice. That, of course, is his prerogative. But in the light of the earlier NSS remarks, some of the comments are interesting:<\/p>\n\u2018There are some people who like to write about terrorism. There\u2019s some people like to express theories about terrorism, theories about religions and so forth. That\u2019s they\u2019re entitled to do that. Duncan Lewis he has actually fought against terrorism. He has led soldiers against terrorism. He is defending Australia today. He knows what he\u2019s talking about and his advice should be heeded\u2026[W]hen I say heeded, I mean listened to, respected. If people think they know better, fine, let them do so, it\u2019s a free country but from my point of view, as the Prime Minister, I rely upon the advice of my security chiefs\u2026\u2019<\/p>\n
Turnbull saves himself, in this case, by clarifying what \u2018heeding\u2019 means. But after doing so he promptly restates his reliance upon his security advisers rather than upon \u2018theorists\u2019. Actually, the proposition that military experience automatically trumps academic theorising is, at best, contestable. After all, the most successful Western strategy of the Cold War\u2014containment\u2014wasn\u2019t devised by a military general but by a diplomat-cum-political scientist, George Kennan.<\/p>\n
It is, of course, still early days in the Turnbull government. And the swapping over of defence ministers as well as prime ministers has, for now, left the government light on national security expertise within its ministerial ranks. But governments shouldn\u2019t make themselves the prisoners of their advisers, either within the security field or beyond it. They shouldn\u2019t make themselves the prisoners even of highly capable advisers, like Duncan Lewis. Advisers advise, and typically do so by putting a range of options before governments and allowing governments to decide.<\/p>\n
In the civil-military field\u2014broadened these days by the steady expansion of the national security portfolio\u2014it\u2019s especially important that governments own the agenda and the decisions that go with it. The willingness of elected governments to embrace tough decisions\u2014sometimes even by going against professional advice\u2014is a core principle of democracy. And it can as easily lead to better outcomes as to worse ones. Moreover, capable and skilled as the ADF is, it\u2019s also a central principle of Western civil-military relations that civilians take the decisions\u2014a principle best captured by Georges Clemenceau\u2019s dictum that war is too important to be left to the generals. Best if the Turnbull government owns its agenda. And with the Defence White Paper not so far away, best it does so soon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Twice now, within the space of a month, the government has signalled an unhealthy submissiveness to its security advisers. The first signal occurred in the National Security Statement. The second swirls through the recent media …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":24028,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,1464,301,376],"class_list":["post-24027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-malcolm-turnbull","tag-national-security-2","tag-politics"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Advice and decision: civil-military relations under the Turnbull government | The Strategist<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n