{"id":24376,"date":"2016-02-01T14:30:03","date_gmt":"2016-02-01T03:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=24376"},"modified":"2016-01-28T16:25:39","modified_gmt":"2016-01-28T05:25:39","slug":"canberra-votes-for-hillary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/canberra-votes-for-hillary\/","title":{"rendered":"Canberra votes for Hillary"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Australia faces two national elections this year\u2014one for our leader and one for our president.<\/p>\n Barring a recurrence of recent Canberra bizarreness, the Oz leadership race will be between Malcolm Turnbull and Bill Shorten.<\/p>\n The \u2018our president\u2019 line refers to the United States. See \u2018our president\u2019 as a description of the next US leader who will preside over our alliance, our challenged superpower and our fading regional hegemon.<\/p>\n Assuming Turnbull isn\u2019t so maddened by the opinion polls that he dashes to an early election before the May budget, the Oz voters will decide just a few weeks ahead of the US voters in November.<\/p>\n Today is the day of the Iowa caucuses, marking the moment when the America\u2019s phony war is extinguished and the real political battle begins.<\/p>\n If you need proof of American exceptionalism, merely consider what an extraordinary race it has been so far and the spills and thrills ahead.<\/p>\n Every foreign ministry around the globe is scratching hard at the myriad meanings of the contest and what it says about the next US president.<\/p>\n My punditry is going to simplify things by assuming the race will be between Hillary and The Donald. Originally, I was going to write about Trump\/Cruz, but hedging is for diplomats and strategists\u2014the pundit lights the fuse and yells \u2018wooshka!\u2019<\/p>\n Even if Trump gets trumped by Cruz\u2014or even if the Republic establishment takes back the party\u2014The Donald has already changed the game. The parameters for predictions about what the US might do in foreign policy have shifted towards unknown places.<\/p>\n Accepting all the \u2018ifs\u2019 of a Hillary-Donald race, it\u2019s already possible to state Australia\u2019s preference for our next president.<\/p>\n Both sides of Oz politics want Hillary.<\/p>\n In the Oz view of the alliance, predictability and reliability are nearly as important as the power the US can deploy. Hillary represents continuity in lots of ways that matter for Australia.<\/p>\n Trump would force Canberra to think new thoughts and ponder new ways. This is tough stuff for a nation that loves the alliance just the way it is. George W. Bush put a dent<\/a> in Australia\u2019s overwhelming public support for the alliance, quickly recovered by Obama. Imagine the impact on Oz public opinion of President Trump\u2014nativist<\/a> and authoritarian<\/a>, with an us-against-them view of almost every foreign policy question asked.<\/p>\n The comfortable Canberra political consensus on the alliance (covering every major party except the Greens) rests on a long-established popular consensus. Much easier to maintain that comfort level with President Hillary.<\/p>\n Malcolm Turnbull, as a Liberal, can vote for a US Democrat in exactly the way that a Labor PM like Bob Hawke could shower the love on Ronald Reagan\u2019s White House. To rework the unofficial slogan of the first (Bill) Clinton campaign: It\u2019s the alliance, stupid!<\/p>\n Kim Beazley<\/a>, departing from Washington after six years as the Australian ambassador, thinks a Trump win is unlikely but there\u2019s no ruling out one horse in a two horse race.<\/p>\n As Defence Minister and later as Labor leader, Beazley was ever a dour realist, with a streak of pessimism that belied his sunny smile. This informs the sharpness of Beazley\u2019s pronouncement that Trump is peddling magic: \u2018It’s a magic man concept. It’s not a program. He doesn’t actually have a program.\u2019<\/p>\n Like Kim, Canberra has little time for magic and distrusts a man without a program. Pity the international analyst who has to predict what President Donald would do about anything.<\/p>\n Hillary, by contrast, does have a program. She offers the alliance more of the same, with a greater focus on Asia. Australia asks little more.<\/p>\n The world view Hillary offers in her memoir<\/a> departs from the entrenched Atlanticism<\/a> of the usual Secretary of State autobiography to plunge into what Asia means for the 21st century.<\/p>\n