{"id":24414,"date":"2016-02-03T06:00:16","date_gmt":"2016-02-02T19:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=24414"},"modified":"2016-02-01T17:03:27","modified_gmt":"2016-02-01T06:03:27","slug":"the-jalan-thamrin-incident-how-should-australia-respond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-jalan-thamrin-incident-how-should-australia-respond\/","title":{"rendered":"The Jalan Thamrin incident\u2014how should Australia respond?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Those of us who have enjoyed a long association with Indonesia would recall, with some affection at least, the former Australian Embassy in Jalan Thamrin. With the Selamat Datang<\/em> (Welcome) monument opposite and the Hotel Indonesia nearby, the embassy was in the heart of Jakarta. Across the road and a few hundred metres north was the Sarinah department store, much loved and frequently visited by President Suharto\u2019s wife, who is remembered with somewhat less affection as Ibu Ten Percent (Ibu Tien).<\/p>\n It was just down the street from Sarinah that the 14 January 2016 shootings and bomb attack took place. As John McBeth has suggested,<\/a> that incident may mark a tactical shift by Islamic State\u2019s Indonesian affiliates away from high profile hotel and embassy targets to more accessible public places where death and destruction may be greater and even more indiscriminate.<\/p>\n The incident raises the question: how should Australia best respond?<\/p>\n Quite properly, Prime Minister Turnbull and Foreign Minister Bishop expressed both their condemnation of the terrorists and condolences for the death of members of the public who just happened to be there. Attorney-General Brandis offered closer intelligence and police cooperation, but without any detail as to what that might entail. The operational relationship between Indonesian and Australian intelligence and police agencies is already close, and short of additional effort by the \u2018Five Eyes\u2019 signals intelligence gatherers, it\u2019s difficult to see what more could be done in the short term.<\/p>\n In circumstances such as this, governments generally look to the immediately available symbols of cooperation without examining deeper and more enduring forms of cooperation that focus on the causes of terrorism rather than its symptoms. For all the resilience of its social institutions\u2014witness the Kami Tidak Takut<\/em> (we are not afraid) Twitter response\u2014Indonesia is a nation whose political, economic and administrative institutions are still evolving.<\/p>\n In contrast to President Hollande\u2019s somewhat hyperbolic reaction to the December attacks in Paris\u2014\u2018France is at war\u2019\u2014President Widodo\u2019s response has been measured and reassuring. In this, his style is closer to that of President Obama and Prime Minister Turnbull than to the more apocalyptic tone adopted by Hollande and former Prime Minister Abbott. Jokowi spoke of actions<\/a> that \u2018disrupt (mengganggu)<\/em> public security and the peace of the people\u2019. Instead of calling for sanctions, he called for calm. Instead of according them credibility and status by referring to the perpetrators as \u2018Islamic terrorists\u2019, he called them for what they were\u2014common criminals.<\/p>\n