{"id":25089,"date":"2016-03-03T13:19:33","date_gmt":"2016-03-03T02:19:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=25089"},"modified":"2016-03-03T13:29:41","modified_gmt":"2016-03-03T02:29:41","slug":"new-subs-not-so-fast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/new-subs-not-so-fast\/","title":{"rendered":"New subs\u2014not so fast"},"content":{"rendered":"
Four years ago we produced a paper on the production timeline for the future submarine, and what that meant for the longevity of the Collins fleet. Our \u2018<\/span>Mind the Gap<\/span><\/a>\u2019 paper was based on information that was already in the public domain at the time and, given the media reporting<\/span> yesterday and today<\/span><\/a>, we thought it worthwhile to reprise what was known even then and to update the conclusions in the light of the recent improved performance on Collins maintenance.<\/span><\/p>\n First, it\u2019s worth recalling what prompted us to write that paper. At the Sea Power 2012 conference in Sydney, the then Project manager for the future submarine, Rear Admiral Rowan Moffitt, presented the following indicative timeline for delivery of the future boats:<\/span><\/p>\n