{"id":25206,"date":"2016-03-08T15:20:42","date_gmt":"2016-03-08T04:20:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=25206"},"modified":"2016-03-08T12:07:53","modified_gmt":"2016-03-08T01:07:53","slug":"dwp-2016-and-self-reliance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/dwp-2016-and-self-reliance\/","title":{"rendered":"DWP 2016 and self-reliance"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
There\u2019s little that\u2019s new in our new White Paper, but there\u2019s one bold innovation which has so far received less attention that it deserves. The Turnbull Government has substantially downgraded, if not quite completely abandoned, the core idea which has been the foundation of Australia\u2019s defence policy for 40 years: the self-reliant defence of Australia. Are we witnessing the end of an era?<\/span><\/p>\n Since the canonical <\/span>Australian Defence<\/span><\/i> of 1976, every White Paper until now has unambiguously affirmed that the principal task of the ADF is the defence of Australia from direct attack, and that it must have the capabilities to do so against any credible threat without relying on the combat forces of our allies. This has been has been the definitive answer to the question \u2018What does the ADF need to be able to do?\u2019 and hence the essential starting point for deciding what capabilities it needs and how much we have to spend on it.<\/span><\/p>\n There\u2019s always been debate about whether the self-reliant defence of Australia <\/span>should<\/span><\/i> have been our primary strategic objective for all these years. But there\u2019s no question that this has been the policy, right up to and including the last White Paper in 2013. Paragraph 3.35 of that document said: \u2018The highest priority ADF task is to deter and defeat armed attacks on Australia without having to rely on the combat or combat support forces of another country\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n Each of its five predecessors in \u201976, \u201987, \u201994, \u201900 and \u201909 had a sentence very like that. So, to be fair, does the 2016 White Paper. Chapter One, paragraph 1.15, which summarises the Defence Strategy that is to be set out in Chapter Three, says:<\/span><\/p>\n \u2018The self-reliant defence of Australia\u2019s territory remains the highest priority for this Government, and protecting Australia from the threat of armed attack or coercion is the primary mission for Defence.\u2019<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n But that isn\u2019t what it says in Chapter Three, where the issue is most extensively addressed. The formulation offered in the table in Paragraph 3.3, and again in the subheading above 3.12 seems intended to be the most authoritative: it goes \u2018Deter, deny and defeat attacks on or threats to Australia and its national interests, and northern approaches\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n There are several points to make about this formulation. First, the phrase \u2018and its national interests\u2019 robs the whole concept of any content, because \u2018national interests\u2019 covers just about anything. Indeed the very next paragraph [3.4] defines the whole set of strategic defence interests up to the global level as merely a subset of national interests. So the direct defence of Australia itself isn\u2019t seen as a distinct objective. (And anyone who thinks this is mere pedantry of no relevance to real decision-making has never sat around the DC table.)<\/span><\/p>\n Second, the apparently authoritative words in paragraph 3.3 don\u2019t say that the ADF should be able to defend Australia without relying on our allies\u2019 forces. As we have seen, self-reliance is mentioned in para 1.15, and it\u2019s mentioned again in Para 3.13, so perhaps their omission elsewhere was on oversight. But if so, that is itself suggestive. It\u2019s more likely, as well as more charitable to those who drafted and approved the White Paper, that we\u2019re seeing here a conscious, or semi-conscious, decision to step back from self-reliance, and return to a defence policy that assumes Australia will always be fighting alongside allies, and that the ADF\u2019s key role is to support such allies. This interpretation is supported by the great emphasis placed throughout the White Paper on working with allies and partners to defend the seemingly-ubiquitous \u2018Rules Based Global Order\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n