{"id":25656,"date":"2016-03-31T11:00:44","date_gmt":"2016-03-31T00:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=25656"},"modified":"2016-03-31T16:48:42","modified_gmt":"2016-03-31T05:48:42","slug":"europe-versus-the-islamic-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/europe-versus-the-islamic-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Europe versus the Islamic State"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
After the 13 November terrorist attacks in Paris that left 130 dead, I wrote a commentary entitled<\/span> ‘We Are At War’<\/span><\/a>\u2014 and faced considerable criticism from readers, Europeans and non-Europeans alike. How dare I use the word ‘war’ to describe the attacks! Words are weapons, and misusing them is irresponsible, even dangerous. Had I not learned anything from George W. Bush\u2019s jingoism?<\/span><\/p>\n In fact, I knew exactly what I was doing when I chose that word. And last week, when Brussels faced a terrorist attack on its airport and a metro station, the emergency services personnel chose the same word, calling for the treating of ‘<\/span>war wounds<\/span><\/a>.’ So I will say it again: We are at war.<\/span><\/p>\n Of course, it is not a traditional war. No formal declaration of hostilities was made; but the attacks on Paris and Brussels were acts of war\u2014deliberate and brutal maneuvers planned by a group of people controlling a large chunk of territory.<\/span><\/p>\n These acts targeted not just Europe\u2019s people, but also its fundamental values, and they are part of a broader pattern of aggression that will not simply fade away. Indeed, though the Islamic State\u2019s territory may be shrinking in Syria and Iraq, it is expanding in Libya. And who knows which countries ISIS may seize tomorrow? Parts of Algeria, for example, could be vulnerable.<\/span><\/p>\n It is time for the European Union to recognize the reality\u2014it is at war, whether it likes it or not\u2014and respond accordingly. If there was ever a moment since the end of World War II when Europe needed to take charge of its<\/span> security<\/span><\/a>, it is now. This means both managing the threat at home and taking a leading role in the fight against ISIS, not only because of Europe\u2019s geographical proximity, but because of the past contributions some of its member states, such as France, Italy, and the United Kingdom, have made to destabilizing the region.<\/span><\/p>\n In this endeavor, it is critical that the terrorists are not conflated with the<\/span> refugees flowing into Europe<\/span><\/a>. The refugees, who are being driven out of their homes largely by the actions of ISIS and other violent actors, represent an important opportunity for Europe. Today\u2019s surging European populists, who hold European values in contempt, cannot be allowed to cause us to miss that opportunity through bigotry and fear mongering.<\/span><\/p>\n Of course, terrorism is not the only security threat that the EU currently faces. With the United States focused on Asia and the Middle East (not to mention itself), it is up to EU leaders to grasp the nettle of limiting Russia\u2019s ambitions in the eastern part of Europe.<\/span><\/p>\n